Text 21194, 53 rader
Skriven 2014-11-09 11:25:00 av Pete C.
Ärende: Re: GMO labeling fails in CO
====================================
sf wrote:
>
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 10:01:31 -0500, "Pete C." <auxReMoVe34@wpnet.us>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > sf wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:05:35 -0500, "Pete C." <auxReMoVe34@wpnet.us>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > sf wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 13:28:28 -0500, "Pete C." <auxReMoVe34@wpnet.us>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Additionally in a "natural" state like CO, the people who do care
about
> > > > > > avoiding GMOs already grow their own food or get it from a local
grower
> > > > > > and know what to avoid in the stores so they see no need to
increase the
> > > > > > costs on the things they do buy.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's a false argument for those who grow their own.
> > > >
> > > > Spent much time in CO? I didn't think so. I have and most everyone has
a
> > > > greenhouse and grows some of their own food. There are also a number of
> > > > local organic co-op type operations.
> > >
> > > They have no reason not to object.
> >
> > Er, exactly though I don't think that's what you intended to write.
>
> You're right.
>
> Colorado isn't just wide open spaces filled with animals and home
> gardens and the group of people you mentioned have zero reason to
> object to a labeling law.

No, there is the stoner dung heap known as Denver, and the PYV dung heap
of Breckenridge.

Most of CO is indeed wide open spaces and farms and ranches and rural
folks with greenhouses. The folks there do indeed have a reason to
object since such a labeling law will cost them more money for the
products they do buy. See my other posts for exactly why it isn't "just
a label" and there are real, substantial costs associated with it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: Chocolat! (1:249/999)