Text 1642, 53 rader
Skriven 2007-03-07 16:31:24 av Alexander Koryagin
Ärende: Have I written correctly?
=================================
message from valid local sender)
From: "Alexander Koryagin" <koryagin@erec.ru>

Hello, All!

Do exist in this place some native Americans speakers? Does this place for
the language practice? So, as they say, "from Russia with love".

Last time I have been listening a lot of criticism for Mr Bush foreign
policy. But, everybody used to say what he is doing, but none, what he has
done already for US. May be the senators in the US are very shy? And all
they could is jumping up in applause of solidarity. Who is not jumping is a
kind of traitor. I saw a similar situation on Cuba's meeting when the
cheerlider shouted to the crowd "Let us show our unity and jump together!
Who will not jump is Yankee!" If you view the videochronicles of Party's
congress from Stalin's epoch you will see the same jumping and clapping.

There was not Al-Qaeda in Iraq before Bush's invasion, but now in Iraq there
are as much Al-Qaeda's terrorists as bees in a beehive. The best possible
scenario (for US) in Iraq is if it became the second Iran. Because there is
no Al-Queda in Iran for a while, and there is some law and order. By the way
it is just another occasion to think do America needs Al-quaeda in Iran
also.
As for Afganistan Bush began the war with Taliban, although it had not been
a terrorist organization; it just refused to give up Ben Laden to America.
Was it an easy task for Taliban to catch Ben Laden and extradite him? Who
knows, but for example general Mladich so far cannot be caught by
pro-western government of Serbia, which wants to do it. But Americans
nevertheless, began the war against the people who had done nothing to them.
In such a way America had got two wars, any of them were connected with the
safety of the country and they forced the anti-american forces to unite
although, before Bush most of them had been anti-american just in words.
So Bush rather can be considered as the main proliferator of terrorism than
the main fighter against it.


Have I put correct the tense in the subject of the letter? It seems to me my
variant too smart. ;)
Should I use 'the' before terrorism?
you will see the same jumping and clapping. "will" is necessary?


PS: If somebody want to check with me the politcorrectness of this letter
along with grammer correctness, please check at first my grammar errors. ;)

[...A close mouth catches no flies]
Bye All!
Alexander
fido7.english-tutor 2007


--- ifmail v.2.15dev5.3
 * Origin: Demos online service (2:5020/400)