Text 1645, 153 rader
Skriven 2007-03-09 08:18:25 av alexander koryagin
     Kommentar till en text av PETER COGGON (1:123/140)
Ärende: Re: Have I written  [1/2]
=================================
message from valid local sender)
From: "alexander koryagin" <koryagin@erec.ru>

Åਢ¥â, PETER COGGON! Š ª â ¬ New York USA ¯®¦¨¢ ¥â?
é á।ã ᥤ쬮£® ¬ àâ , âë ¯¨á « ª ALEXANDER KORYAGIN ­ áç¥â
"Re: Have I written  [1/2]"

 PC>   Hello Alexander.     Native American speakers?   Do you mean English?
 PC> How about a contact in Canada ... "The Great White North"

Yea, I like Canada, they say that it is as cold as there as in Russia. ;)

[Sorry, skipped]
 PC> judged by history.   Sooner or later the truth is known, and it
 PC> is then all comments and sources are collected to judge a leader.

But my article was not a letter to the UN assembly; I just had to imagine
some subject for discussion. And may be with some flame inside it as a fuel.

 AK>> Last time I have been listening a lot of criticism for Mr Bush foreign
 AK>> policy. But, everybody used to say what he is doing, but none, what he
 AK>> has done already for US. May be the senators in the US are very shy?

 PC>   Most likely the same in a lot of countrys, where there are other
 PC> political leaders, and their teams, trying to get elected or a chance
 PC> next time, they spend time digging up dirt about the country's leader.

But these countries at least are not proliferating terrorism. Of course I
agree that the court intrigues had been, were, and will be as far as exits
the dirty business of politics. Because as a rule, imho, the normal, honest
people, capable to work, never tend to leave their way of life for the sake
of politics. Only authoritarian kind of people who do not want to work are
proun be politicians. And of course actors or hypocrites. ;)

 PC>   All politicians have to follow the party line.  If not you loose
 PC> your support, and that means those who elected you, are left out
 PC> of the processed. Why contact your representative if he is following
 PC> the party plaform, or what is agreed on in their many meetings.

 PC>   History one day will judge Mr. Bush, as it will everyone else.

The history by the way is in danger. If such a policy will be continued, the
anti-americans, anti-israeli moods will rise over the critical level. For me
it is very easy predict what will happen then. The number of muslim radicals
and fanatics will rise dramatically. Perves Musharash the Pakistan
pro-american dictator will be the fist victim. And US, Israel (and the West
in general) will get very cool enimy with a bunch of ballistic rockets and
nuclear bombs. The present day policy is like a playing with a fire. It can
be easily kindled, but it is impossible to put it out. He will stop only
when no fuel.

[Sorry, skipped]
 AK>> the same jumping and clapping.

 PC>    I have also heard in Canada, that if you don't agree you are the
 PC> enemy, which is similar to if you don't jump with us...you are a
 PC> yankee.  Well I don't jump and I suspect there is many like that
 PC> all over the globe who are trying to keep together their fragile
 PC> democtratic system, or trying to attain what many take as a right.

Many times I watched C-span satellite broadcasts of US congress meetings,
and I think that democracy in jeopardy when in congress not 100 individuals,
but actually two. I mean a senator must have courage to vote as he thinks,
but not as his party oblige him. Of course it is more important during these
crutial time.
And most awful thing when decision mixed up with the dead soldiers. "Did
they die in vain? We must send more troups and certainly we will win!" But
what a price for this promise? Oh, how senators want to believe that at this
time the president said the truth. He thought "Let send. My Lord! Let Bush
to prevail over terrorists! My Lord! why in the world so many terrorists
now?"

 PC>    I have seen Stalin's film footage.  It is amazing that Lenin
 PC> did not want him to succeed him to lead the Russia or USSR.
 PC> Perhaps if Lenin had not died, or had someone to handoff power
 PC> or perhaps if they had decided in the parliament of the USSR
 PC> they could have elected someone that might have made Communism
 PC> work  < on paper it works> but well history shows Stalin and
 PC> what he did.    He gave them state run this and that, but at
 PC> the same time, no thinking, and only death.

It difficult to say what for history better. Imho the fanatic fascist regime
could had been overpowered only by the same kind fanatic regime. But the
second one must be an antagonist to fascism. Western democracies were not
capable to fight to until death. The Soviet soldier saved the world and just
because that he must be respected. The mission of USSR was to save the world
from Hitler.

We can imagine sins of Soviet army after WWII as a debt. But it is nothing
in compare with what SA had done to the world. Of course some countries,
like Estonia for example, were never happy to be released from Hitler. They
would have been happier if USSR had been conquered. That's why they are
considering the mentioned debt of SA bigger than the blood spilt for their
release from Hitler.

 PC>   When the USSR fell,   it should have been letdown slowly
 PC> so the citizens of the country could take time to adjust
 PC> and elect representatives to parliament to make national
 PC> decisions, and the UN who does help run elections and keep
 PC> things stable, should have offered more to help with the
 PC> process to a more democratic communism or end it and
 PC> go Parliamentary democratic.

I have already said who the politicians are.

 PC>   I saw so many people cutoff from state pensions, and then
 PC> the criminals moved in, the big businesses to scoop up
 PC> state run industrys...etc....what a madhouse.

Most of high ideals of communism including moral ones were discredited, and
the scumbags are like viruses into the body of a man who had lost immunity.

 AK>> There was not Al-Qaeda in Iraq before Bush's invasion, but now in Iraq
 AK>> there are as much Al-Qaeda's terrorists as bees in a beehive. The best
 AK>> possible scenario (for US) in Iraq is if it became the second Iran.

 PC>   The Al-Qaeda have stated that they went into Iraq to get training
 PC> and improve their actions against the USA and it's allies.  What better
 PC> way to engage your enemy, then have him innvloved in a military
 PC> conflict so close to home.   It might not be an old organization
 PC> but many, now just united under one leadership.

I think leadership of one person in Al-Qaeda is exaggerated. Any undeground
orgainization is like manyhead hydra from the Greek Mythology. The more
heads are cut off the stronger, more dangerous and cautious became the
beast. That is how, according Darwin evolution, the devils incarnate came to
the world.

 PC>   I always think of the people, and I remember when the first troops
 PC> entered the capital, and many people said..okay we did it, now
 PC> lets turn over the reigns to who is left.   But it was a learnered
 PC> Iraqi and Bush was all bent to make a western society there which
 PC> is a pipe dream.   The advice was well taken, and I will always
 PC> remember everyone there cheering the USA...but they should have
 PC> listened to those in Iraq that could have formed a governent
 PC> and left ASP....

All what Bush had to do - just to check the presence nuclear weapon
industry; that was the main headache for US. But everything he has been
doing since the defeat of Saddam are horrible, dangerous and irresponsible
actions. Irresponsible, for Bush still are doing things as he wants, and he
is using the spilt blood of American soldiers as an umbrella. And the more
deaths the wider became an umbrella.

[...Bene vobis]
Bye PETER!
Alexander
fido7.english-tutor 2007



--- ifmail v.2.15dev5.3
 * Origin: Demos online service (2:5020/400)