Text 10107, 83 rader
Skriven 2004-11-22 10:32:00 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
  Kommentar till text 10095 av Thom LaCosta (1:261/1352.0)
Ärende: Science 1/2
===================
 >> Amazing how easy it is to anticipate your agenda and methods.

 >  MvdV> Well, that goes both ways. I see that you still refuse to
 >  MvdV> acknowledge that the rule "moderator loses his hat when he lets
 >  MvdV> the listing expire" is one of you own fabrication. There just
 >  MvdV> isn't any binding rule saying so.

 > It's not my fabriction...

Well, it certainly is a fabrication and if you were not the one to invent it,
you adopted it and that makes it your fabrication too.

 > it's been going on long before I was in Fidonet and operating the
 > Echolist.

Only in a part of FidoNet. A part that is now a smal minority. It never was a
generally FidoNet wide accepted rule.

 > Frankly, I am getting sick and tired of having to counter all the
 > lies that you generate.

LOL! You keep trying to have us believe that the echolist is generally accepted
as the ultimate authority on who is moderator and you accuse me of telling
lies?

 >  MvdV> Frankly you disappoint me. I would have thought you to not so
 >  MvdV> easily give in. I expected you to be more creative. Instead you
 >  MvdV> simply ignore the issue. A sign of weakness.

 > You are so full of yourself it's disgusting...and you most
 > likely have brown eyes.  If they are any ohter color, I
 > expect them to change, since what you're full of is getting deeper.

Well, as a non native speaker I will have to guess what you mean by the
reference to the brown eyes. Given the context I suspect it is a derogatory
remark.

How typical and predictable. You run out of arguments so you revert to a
personal attack.

 >> I never said there was a law that dictated that.

 >  MvdV> Indeed. And so your claim that the echolist is an
 >  MvdV> "official registry" is one of your own invention, with
 >  MvdV> nothing to back it up.

 > Eitrher talk to some echomail movers

I have repeatedly asked who these echomail movere are. You refuse to answer
that question. So how can I ask them if you won't tell me who they are?

 >> I think they arrived at a very creative solution.

 >  MvdV> Who are "they"?

Again: who are "they"?

 >> Your previous hijack attempts of this echo

 >  MvdV> I made no attempt to hijack this echo.

 > You certainly did....

Please provide proof of your allegations.

1) Prove that whoever attempted to change the record did so with the intent of
taking it away from the rightful moderator.

2) If you have proven 1, prove that it was me who made the attempt.

 > an automated warning was sent out when you attempted to
 > hijack the echo....

LOL. We all know how automated this robot is. You preview the mod updates
before feeding them to the robot. You did so with Björn's mod update for this
echo and you this do with my latest update for the science echo.

So how can we trust you to not have fiddled with that "automated' warning?

Cheers, Michiel

--- InterMail 2.50
 * Origin: If privacy is outlawed, only outlaws have privacy. (2:280/5555)