Text 14691, 107 rader
Skriven 2005-10-13 10:34:00 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
  Kommentar till text 14670 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
Ärende: looters in NO
=====================
 >>>>> The only picture of me on the web has my shirt outside my
 >>>>> pants, so you won't be able to see if I'm wearing a belt or not.

 MvdV>>>> /If/ that is you. We only have your word for it you know....

 >>> We can say the same for your pictures too.

 MvdV>> Except that I have witnesses who I have met in person and who can
 MvdV>> testify to it. Ask Jan Vermeulen. Ask Herman Neut. Ask Kees van
 MvdV>> Eeten. Ask Ward. Ask David Rance. Ask Steven Leeman.

 > Yeah, but we don't know if they're real persons either.

Who is the "we" that you are speaking of. certainly not "you and me". *I* know
that these people exist, I have met them in person.

There are several people in Z1 who have met Ward in person. So they are not
included in the "we" either.

 MvdV>> The picture you showed us looks like a shot from a movie picture,
 MvdV>> (Wide screen).

 MvdV>> So maybe the car is yours. That does not prove the person
 MvdV>> in the other picture walking past the back of a similar
 MvdV>> looking car is you.

 > Well, it's either mine or else it belongs to the person who
 > took the photo.

Why? All I see is a white Camaro with a black stripe over the hood. There may
be thousands of them. How do I know it is yours? There is no front plate. (Not
required in California?)

 > Since I've shown you other links to the car that show a
 > title stating it belongs to me,

As I said, no visible plate, so I do not know it is the same car.

 > I'd believe that's me in the photo.

It could be anyone who happened to pass by.

The problem with you is that you have demonstrated to be an unreliable source
of information. You have been caught several times in telling a straight out
lie. As a result I do not believe *anything* where I just have to go on your
word.

 MvdV>> You still have the both of them?

 > Yeup. Plus a 2002 Chevrolet Silverado Pickup, a 2000 GMC W4500
 > cab over box van and a 56 Chevrolet sedan.

That's a fleet!

 MvdV>> Sometimes I envy you Americans. Over here it is practically
 MvdV>> impossible to have more than two cars unless you are a millionare.

 > That's about right. It costs me $40/month to store the GMC.

Couldn't find that here for that price.

 > That's the least of my problems though. Insurance on all of
 > them combined is quite high.

 MvdV>> Where does one park it?

 > The 98 Camaro is in the garage next to the 56 Chevy.

Two car garages are rare here. This is a heavy populated area. Ground prices
are in the order of Eur 600,- a square metre. people do not like to waste their
precious acerage on garages. My gardeb is 500 square metres. That ius
considered big for this area.

 > My Silverado is in the driveway along with Nancy's BMW

Are they not in the way when you want to take out the Camaro?

 > and the GMC is in a storage lot.

 > The 88 Camaro is still parked at my friends house where we stayed
 > before buying this place. I drove that out here last November, then
 > took a train  back to San Diego.

Afraid of flying?

 > I flew my buddy out to San Diego, he drove the GMC, while I
 > drove the Silverado. Then, I flew back to San Diego and Nancy
 > drove her BMW, while I drove the 98 Camaro.

You should have rented a truck to haul them all in one go.;-)

 >>> Oh, if you go to the Message Board, you'll find posts there
 >>> with the white Camaro in my signature.

 >>> http://www.camaroclubofsandiego.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=457

 MvdV>> I can see the message. No white Camaro there though...

 > I was there yesterday and posted more messages. You should
 > find my posts there with pictures in them.

Sorry, can't find them.

Cheers, Michiel

---
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.nodelist.org (2:280/5555)