Text 18110, 74 rader
Skriven 2005-12-07 18:55:12 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 17847 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
Ärende: Control The Smoke!!!
============================

 FS>> That's where you made your *first* mistake.  I *never* called you a liar
 FS>> or "almost" a liar!  I simply questioned the quality of the information
 FS>> you had received.  That's one hell of a big difference. Furthermore I
 FS>> gave you my reason for *not* believing it and you rejected that entirely.

 BF>> Why shouldn't I since I had seen the evidence that you rejected entirely.

 FS> I rejected your *news-source*, not your honesty!  Furthermore I explained
 FS> *why* I didn't believe it.  You simply would not accept that, and that was
 FS> because you don't know how the "news"media operate *here*.

You rejected my news-source even when I told you that I had seen evidence
and that must mean that you reject even me and what does it then take to
convince you?

 FS> Whenever they
 FS> can find something undesirable about America they're *eager* to print it.
 FS> That's the way they operate!  I *know* you don't believe that so just
 FS> forget it.

Obviously it didn't work like that this time but that's hardly *my* fault.

 BF>> It would have been better if you had said "Oooppsss, this was news" and
 BF>> had listned before being so categorical.

 FS> I had *strong* evidence against it ... see above.  However it's evidence
 FS> which you will *not* accept because you don't know how the "news"media
 FS> operate here.

But I know how they work here....
You didn't accept the evidence I presented so why should I accept yours?
It's a matter of trust in each other and if it doesn't work both ways, Huston
we
have a problem.

 BF>>> #3. The disussion with Roy about moose. I live in a country where we see
 BF>>> moose almost whenever we want to and I also have them in my yard and
 BF>>> people are actually killed on the roads after having chrashed with them
 BF>>> and they are a huge problem here so who's the best to talk about moose,
 BF>>> him or me?

 FS>> I would say *you*.  I know little about the habits of moose having seen
 FS>> only one in the wild in my entire life when on a fishing trip into
 FS>> Canada.

Why wasn't it the same with N379P since it we me who knew what we were
talking about even then?

 FS> OK, here's the situation:  I tend to treat people as they treat
 FS> me.  If someone is civil to me, I'm always civil to him.  If someone
 FS> starts crabbing at me I give it right back to him -- with interest.

Just like me then. If you would have had a civil manner and listned withouth
rejecting it categorically, this situation would never had happend.

 FS> If
 FS> you'll note, in those echoes the people I'm dealing with treat *me*
 FS> civilly.  I don't mean we don't have differences of opinion, but that we
 FS> deal with them in a *civil* manner.

Is it "civil" to claim that USA won WW2 when it was the allied who did it?

 FS> And if you think I treat Americans better than foreigners you're *badly*
 FS> mistaken.

Who in this echo have you been getting along with, exept Americans?
And don't come running with: "They have been naughty to me so I have
to get even". It can't be everyone else fault that they have a problem
with you and it's just this attitude that pisses the rest of the world off
when dealing with Americans.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)