Text 20140, 54 rader
Skriven 2005-12-27 15:33:33 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 20040 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
Ärende: Editorial
=================

 BF>>>> You claim that those non-existing things have been moved.

 FS>>> Well?  Where *are* they, if they *haven't* been moved?  They certainly
 FS>>> haven't been detonated ...

 BF>>> How the hell can you move something that doesn't exist?

 FS>> You *can't*.  And, if you'll notice, I've made no such claim ... I
 FS>> included some "ifs" ...

 BF>> So now they all of a sudden you agree to that they doesn't exist or what
 BF>> are you trying to tell me?

 FS> Nothing "all of a sudden" at all, Björn.  And I think you *know* what I'm
 FS> telling you ...

I most certainly don't since above you asked where they are since they
haven't been detonated and now you say that you never made such claim
so you better tell me what's going on here.

 BF>>> Prove their existance *first* and THEN we can talk about how they was
 BF>>> moved. You must be paranoid.

 FS>> What gives you the idea I'm paranoid?  You have no reason whatsoever to
 FS>> think that.

 BF>> Changing subjecs now, are we?
 BF>> What happend to you proving there are WMD:s in Iraq?

 FS> Huh?  When did I ever say I could prove the presence of WMDs in Iraq?
 FS> Read what I write not what your imagination dredges up.

So why did you ask me where they have been moved at the top of this msg.
if you weren't sure of their existance?

  BF>>> Then I can prove that Bush is a liar because that's what I have been
 BF>>> informed.

 FS>> You can *think* he's a liar but you certainly cannot *prove* it. If you
 FS>> could have, you *would* have done it instead of just blowing smoke here!

 BF>> I have proved that Bush is a liar just as much as he could prove there
 BF>> are WMD:s in Iraq and that was my point but obviously that flow far above
 BF>> your head.

 FS> You have "proved" *nothing* -- absolutely *nothing*!  You come to a
 FS> conclusion based on your imagination and think that's "proof" ... heh heh
 FS> heh ...

You are still far, far away from getting my point so even here I rest my case.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)