Text 20699, 62 rader
Skriven 2006-01-02 11:10:28 av Stewart Arnett (3:772/100)
  Kommentar till text 20665 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
Ärende: Lack of Gratitude
=========================
Hello FRANK.

01 Jan 06 07:36, you wrote to me:

 FS> -=> Quoting Stewart Arnett to Carol Shenkenberger <=-

 SA>> Hello Carol.

 SA>> 31 Dec 05 15:03, you wrote to FRANK SCHEIDT:

 CS>> *** Quoting FRANK SCHEIDT from a message to CAROL SHENKENBERGER
 CS>> ***

 CS>>> Your posts until yesterday looked like you had been there.

 FS>>> I at no time said that!  I said I was a soldier for 3-1/2 years
 FS>>> during WWII but *never* said or even implied I was in the

 CS>> Then you havent been reading the replies sent to you very well.
 CS>> Even just scanning this thread it was obvious at the start that
 CS>> you were inferred as 'having been there'.  Frank, you should have
 CS>> corrected that right at the start of this month long thread, not
 CS>> now.  Your credibility is now in question as to what possible
 CS>> experience you may have had when it comes to the memories of
 CS>> folks who's parents lived through it.

 SA>> He has just told me he was there and served 3 1/2 years, not only
 SA>> does he dream he seems to be senile. His story is now changing
 SA>> faster than a whores draws.

 FS> "Seems to be senile" ... [sigh] ... if all you can come up is ad
 FS> hominem attacks why even *try* to communicate???

So now you have forgotten what you wrote only a few day ago, what does that
look like to you? It seems to be a form of demetia or forgetfulness. In one
message you say you "was" there, the next you didn't actively serve in the
European arena during WWII, then you will not answer where you served actively
and then "I *was* there" . Make your mind up man and stop trying to fool us and
yourself by contradictory  statements, you were either there or not.

I'm beginning to believe you saw no active service as a soldier but were
enlisted and stayed on US soil.

In which case you were not there and saw nothing of what you are trying to
convince us of as being your truth, contrary to that as told us by servicemen
who were our relatives and who also were there, quite literaly in fact. You say
you read the newspapers, intimating in one message they were from the Great War
era, of the time and read between the lines. The area between the lines shows
no facts or records, it is pretty white (or yellowing on old papers) and very
void of information even the print in those times was subject to government
censure and propaganda. It is in truth just the stuff of dreams, as it is
pretty quickly coming to light was your active involvement in the European war
effort and the Allied operations in Europe. You were not there, so don't claim
any thing else or intimate by clever inuendo that you were involved in the
actual fighting. Doing this just makes people think you are only senile or
lying, either takes a lot of serious work on your part to recover from, an
apology would be the first effort.

Stewart

--- GoldED/2 3.0.1
 * Origin: The RockBBS Auckland NZ 64-9-5799604 (3:772/100)