Text 20729, 56 rader
Skriven 2006-01-01 23:18:00 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av STEWART ARNETT
Ärende: Lack of Gratitude
=========================
-=> Quoting Stewart Arnett to Frank Scheidt <=-

 CS>>> Your posts until yesterday looked like you had been there.
 
 FS>>> I at no time said that!  I said I was a soldier for 3-1/2 years
 FS>>> during WWII but *never* said or even implied I was in the
 
 CS>> Then you havent been reading the replies sent to you very well.
 CS>> Even just scanning this thread it was obvious at the start that
 CS>> you were inferred as 'having been there'.  Frank, you should have
 CS>> corrected that right at the start of this month long thread, not
 CS>> now.  Your credibility is now in question as to what possible
 CS>> experience you may have had when it comes to the memories of
 CS>> folks who's parents lived through it.
 
 SA>> He has just told me he was there and served 3 1/2 years, not only
 SA>> does he dream he seems to be senile. His story is now changing
 SA>> faster than a whores draws.
 
 FS> "Seems to be senile" ... [sigh] ... if all you can come up is ad
 FS> hominem attacks why even *try* to communicate???

 SA> So now you have forgotten what you wrote only a few day ago, what does
 SA> that look like to you? It seems to be a form of demetia or
 SA> forgetfulness. In one message you say you "was" there, the next you
 SA> didn't actively serve in the European arena during WWII, then you will
 SA> not answer where you served actively and then "I *was* there" . Make
 SA> your mind up man and stop trying to fool us and yourself by
 SA> contradictory  statements, you were either there or not. 
 SA> I'm beginning to believe you saw no active service as a soldier but
 SA> were enlisted and stayed on US soil.

 SA> In which case you were not there and saw nothing of what you are
 SA> trying to convince us of as being your truth, contrary to that as told
 SA> us by servicemen who were our relatives and who also were there, quite
 SA> literaly in fact. You say you read the newspapers, intimating in one
 SA> message they were from the Great War era, of the time and read between
 SA> the lines. The area between the lines shows no facts or records, it is
 SA> pretty white (or yellowing on old papers) and very void of information
 SA> even the print in those times was subject to government censure and
 SA> propaganda. It is in truth just the stuff of dreams, as it is pretty
 SA> quickly coming to light was your active involvement in the European
 SA> war effort and the Allied operations in Europe. You were not there, so
 SA> don't claim any thing else or intimate by clever inuendo that you were
 SA> involved in the actual fighting. Doing this just makes people think you
 SA> are only senile or lying, either takes a lot of serious work on your
 SA> part to recover from, an apology would be the first effort.

You certainly waste a lot of time, don't you?  ... heh heh heh 
...

... Death ÄÄ Nature's way of saying "Slow down."

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)