Text 22994, 116 rader
Skriven 2006-01-18 10:12:45 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
  Kommentar till text 22971 av Frank Vest (1:124/6308.1)
Ärende: Lack of Gratitude
=========================
18 Jan 06 05:13, Frank Vest wrote to Roy Witt:

 RW>  FV>>> I, at least, checked the gender before flaming off at the
 RW>  FV>>> mouth!
 RW>  RW>>> You checked the name, but didn't ask the person who uses it.
 FV>> I wasn't the one jumping on the one using the name.
 RW>> You commented. That's all that's required for a reply in echomail.
 FV> True enough.
 FV>> The name is female. I suppose that it could be a "Boy Named Sue"
 FV>> thing, but I doubt it.
 RW>> I do too, since I followed the thread about her name when she and
 RW>> xxcarol were discussing it.
 FV> That worked out well. :)
 RW>  FV>>>  Why am I getting your lip?
 RW>  RW>>> Because you're first on my shit list?
 FV>> I would wonder why.
 RW>> Note the ? mark...

 FV> I did. Seems that you were/are not sure where to place me.

No, the question would indicate that I didn't know whether or not you were
on my shit list and I merely asked the obvious.

 FV> It appears that you might only have a shit list to rate people and
 FV> that people are placed upon it dependent on some scale that only you
 FV> know. I would wonder where I am placed and why.

See, you assume that I have one.

 FV>> I did not reply to you. I did not insult you and yet you saw fit to
 FV>> reply to me in defense of the other Frank.
 RW>> Is it not a free echo where anyone can comment to anyone else?
 FV> Yes. However, some stay away from responding to third, fourth and
 FV> more party conversations.

Sure, when there is something one person knows and thinks sharing that
infomation would clear up a discussion going no where, well, you know.

 FV>>  I suppose you are his butt buddy?
 RW>> Coming from you, that's an awfully stupid question.

 FV> You appeared to be defending his assumption.

As you can see by his writing, he doesn't need defending. He's quite
capable of doing that by himself.

 FV> If that was an error, my apologies.

 RW>  FV>>> 2. I checked the gender when I read the post.
 RW>  RW>>> Not likely.
 FV>> In your opinion.
 RW>> Thanks, for a while there I figured you might not allow me an
 RW>> opinion.

 FV> As you note, I have no real way to prevent you opinion. This is,
 FV> after all, and echo.

There ya go.

 RW>  FV>>> 3. You can jump off me as fast as you jumped on me.
 RW>  RW>>> Not if I don't want to.
 FV>> That is correct. But you can.
 RW>> That is correct.
 FV> More agreement.
 FV>> Where do we go from here?
 RW>> You can just forget to reply and that'd be fine. Or we can continue
 RW>> the 'you did' 'did not' BS and be like everyone else. But of course,
 RW>> you're above that.
 FV> Thank you for the compliment.

You're welcome.

 FV> In some cases and with some people, a failure to reply is considered
 FV> an admittance of defeat.

Or, it could be that there is no more discussion needed.

 FV>> We've had no recent battles that I'm aware of.
 RW>> Correct. But that doesn't me you can't start one if you like.
 FV> Would you enjoy it?

I'm getting bored with the fights here. I'd rather discuss something
interesting.

 FV>> You replied to me and in doing so, jumped into something that was
 FV>> not your concern.
 RW>> Anything in an open echo concerns everyone else in the echo. That's
 RW>> why it's an echo. Think of it as an open forum on any subject that
 RW>> comes up.
 FV> Anyone is free to comment, but not all things in an echo concern, or
 FV> are of interest to, everyone. That is what the "next" key is for. ;)

I would have done that, but then I thought you might be interested in
knowing the facts. Maybe you don't.

 FV>> Your choice.
 RW>> Yeup. Your choice could be to continue your 'private' conversation
 RW>> in netmail if you don't want anyone else to comment on it.

 FV> If someone is concerned or interested, they are welcome. I have a
 FV> "next" key and I know how to use it. I might be interested or
 FV> concerned, however, and reply. :)

Well, the former would be good for lowering the noise here. That is what
you're advocating, right?

 RW>> Have a day.

 FV> I normally do. Unless it is night, of course. :D

How about those hours in-betweeen?


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)