Text 26531, 98 rader
Skriven 2006-03-21 12:29:24 av Philip Lozier (1:267/169)
  Kommentar till text 26523 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
Ärende: Elist
=============
 >> Why should I bother?

 MVDV>> IOW, you have no proof. Thought so....

 FS> As I said, why should I bother?  You make the assumption I *care*
 FS> what you think of me ... heh heh heh ...


Does -anybody- here really care what we all assume or care about each other? 
Fact is (I believe anyway) that the opponents on different things here actually
would be the best of buds given the right circumstances.  We also would -hate-
if our familiar opponents vanished into the night as that would remove much of
our fun amongst each other... something and somebodies we all pretend to
-hate-, but Lord, don't we love to play the gamE.

 MVDV>>>> Right, I did not err. You did however erred by assuming I
 MVDV>>>> meant to type an ellipsis....

This ellipsis thing is getting about as played out as references to Hegel ...
whichever side it's continuing from.


This is what you call a gofuckthis... !!!!!!!!FUCKTHIS!!!!!!!
 >>
 >>> My assumption was accurate

 MVDV>>> No, it wasn't. Denying is useless, your responses have been
 MVDV>>> recorded and they show otherwise.
 FS>
 >> I'm certain they've also been "edited" ... heh heh heh ...

Certain places that archive echomail messages insure that if one has been
edited, the orinals can be refered to, therefore negating the alleged editing.

 MVDV>> Edited? By whom and how? The messages you wrote are saved in the
 MVDV>> message bass of hundreds if not thousands of FidoNet participants. How
 MVDV>> could anyone ever alter all those copies in a consistent way?

 FS> By *you* of course ... or don't you understand?

MVDV is God now?  He can change the messages on umpteen-umpteen systems?  Come
on now... your Reagan is showing if you believe that.

 MVDV>>> I set the trap by typing four dots. You walked into the trap by
 MVDV>>> assuming I meant to type an ellipsis. The trap closed when you
 MVDV>>> responded. You lost.
 FS>
 >> One does not "trap" me by posting a malformed ellipsis.

Quite right... only makes me wonder why you haven't started adding "difference
(& whatever)" to your taglines the way you blat about it.

 MVDV>> Yoiu are arguing against the facts. I trapped you.

 FS> Yeah ... sure ... BTW, that's sarcasm ...
 FS>
 >> That's merely a cry for help.  I've helped you.  *Now* you know
 >> what an ellipsis is,

Like reference to Hegel... who gives a flying granny lay?

 >>> BTW, despite your stubbornness in refusing to learn I must
 >>> admit your English is *far* better than my (non-existent) Dutch ...
 >>> brag about *that* if you wish.


At least one redeeming quality of late.

 MVDV>>> Sorry, I decline. I never brag about my knowledge of my native
 MVDV>>> language. Certainly not to non native speakers.

And a stubborn attitude (as per par for the course for you Michael) against
taking credit when due, despite the fact that your response line seemd to "miss
the point".

 FS>
 >> I *still* have admiration for people who are fluent in more
 >> than one language ... not enough admiration, of course, to have
 >> caused *me* to become fluent in more than one unfortunately ...

 MVDV>> Unfortunately indeed. If you had made such an attempt it would have
 MVDV>> taught you some humility. Lessons in humility are good for improving
 MVDV>> human interaction.

Advice that could be taken by the giver, maybe?

 FS> Huh?  It certainly didn't teach *you* any humility -- and you
 FS> have much to be humble about ... heh heh heh ...

As do you numba won.  You have shown much to be humble about lately...
specificly your delusions of grandeur and false beliefs of being an "all
knowing soul" or something like that.

Sheesh... picture *ME* actually -defending- Michael van der Vlist... sumpins
prolly wrong here. Wunda wut it prolly mite b?

--- FMail/Win32 1.60
 * Origin: ==<<FLaSHBaCK-BBS>>== part of the NYCap/Adirondack Netwo (1:267/169)