Text 27893, 155 rader
Skriven 2006-04-20 12:43:31 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
  Kommentar till text 27789 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
20 Apr 06 07:40, Björn Forsström wrote to Roy Witt:


 BF>>> The only truth is that he was alive, the other only seems to be his
 BF>>> one-sided opinion.

 RW>> In your opinion. What he relates here is how I see it as well,
 RW>> knowing from my own background how it went in those times.

 BF> What went on in USA, sure, but you haven't a Clue<tm> what went on
 BF> here. Perhaps you need a Clue<tm> Adjustment.

I think it is you who needs the clue adjustment. We have a very fine
education system where the facts of WW1 and WW2 are very well documented.
I take it from your spiel that you were very active in the military during
WW2...

 BF>>>>>  and the right to "educate" or should I say, force,
 RW>>>> No one is forcing you to read what he says. There is the next key.
 BF>>> As I use when it comes from him.
 BF>>> Why don't you do the same when it comes from someone you dislike?
 RW>> Because they're the only reason I post here.

 BF> Must be a boring life you have, eh...?

Not with fools like we have here. They keep me entertained while I'm
taking time out from my other activities in life. These are just a few of
the moments I take to have a little fun...

 BF> ......but why do *you* then tell *me* to use the next key (see
 BF> above)?....

Because you're a whiner and can't handle what goes on here. You might as
well go sit on  your park bench and imbibe more whiskey...that should keep
you napping longer.

 BF>  Don't do what I tell you to do, do as I do, eh...? ...and
 BF> then you whine..... Strange.

I'm not the one who's whining about it...you are.

 RW>>>> However, if you want to know about WW2, I'd shy away from the
 RW>>>> schools there in urope, as they seem to have skipped over that
 RW>>>> part of history.
 BF>>> You have been told before that it's the winner that writes the
 BF>>> history. Perhaps we have the right version.
 RW>> Your country wasn't a winner, they colaborated with the Nazi. You
 RW>> admit that yourself.

 BF> I don't have any idea about why they let the Germans transit Sweden
 BF> and I think that that is still classified.

LOL! There's only one reason to colaborate with them...other wise it's
total anilation for the svedes.

 BF> All I know is that I didn't have anything to do with it. But since
 BF> the 50's we have been colaborating with USA and then that must be as
 BF> bad,

Only if you're guilty of killing a few million innocent Jews.

 BF> especially since we are neutral.

You can't be a collaborator and be neutral all at the same time.

 BF> Remember N379P? And now even more countries have agreed to "helping"
 BF> CIA and USA.

Do you still believe in that hoax? My my, you sure are easily impressed.

 BF>>>>> his opinion on to others?
 RW>>>> Facts are facts, whether or not they're the opinion of someone
 RW>>>> who's making a valid point is of no concern for the learned or the
 RW>>>> student.
 BF>>> His "facts" comes from papers and news from within the US. He
 BF>>> wasn't here you know so he couldn't speak about any "facts".
 RW>> So you say. He also says that the facts come from the uropeon war
 RW>> zone. Second hand of course, but if you can't believe your own
 RW>> brother, who can you believe?

 BF> He isn't my brother.

But he's been telling you about his brother's experience at the front.

 BF> And why should we believe him or you, you two don't believe in
 BF> anything anyone else says and if it should work one way it should
 BF> even work the other.

Why should it work, if all we hear from you is untruths?

 BF> Otherweise it isn't a dialouge and that doesn't benifit any of us.

You're overlooking that fact that you're getting a real education, not one
of those uropeon style of educations where they leave out the facts and
fill your brain with bullshit.

 BF> Think I've told you this before but wht should you listen. You always
 BF> know the best.

I'm glad that you agree.

 BF>>>>> As Roger Nelson said, it was a mistake (my second) posting here
 BF>>>>> where there only are Einstein:s. I leave the mudslinging to you
 BF>>>>> and retire to my park-bench, the coffe is getting cold.
 RW>>>> Yes, which reminds me of the cliche'; if you can't play with the
 RW>>>> big dogs, stay out of the game.
 BF>>> I have about 25 years experience from dogs and those 25 years have
 BF>>> learned me that the dog that barks the loudest is the most
 BF>>> cowardly.
 RW>> I've been around them longer then that and this isn't true.

 BF> It sure as hell is.

Not.

 BF> I've never heard a New Foundland or a S:t Bernhard bark but all this

Then you have less experience than I do. I've had more than one St Bernard
put both of this front paws on my chest and bark in my face. That was a
junk yard guard dog. Another one was on the loose, and I was minding my
own business, just walking down this lonely country road.

 BF> small miniature poodle/schnauzer/pincher all sounds just like you.

Nawww, they're whiners, just like you.

 BF> Barking for everything without any reason for doing so.

They're bred to do that, dog expert...they're also very good feet warmers,
which they're also bred to do. And a guard dog is a guard dog, no matter
how big or how small.

So much for your dog expertism.

 BF>>> It's the silent one I'm afraid of. And if that's what counts here,
 BF>>> to be the loudest barking dog, it certainly isn't me.

 RW>> The one to be aware of is the one who's ears are layed back and his
 RW>> teeth are showing. The silent one is merely sleeping. Frankly, I
 RW>> prefer cats. They're smarter than dogs and much cleaner.

 BF> Those who you speak about can always be calmed unless the are very
 BF> well trained to attack.

I wouldn't bet my 'Sunday going to meetin' pants on that if I were you.
LOL!

 BF> I've calmed many of then down just by talking nicely to them.

Sure you have.


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)