Text 28561, 67 rader
Skriven 2006-04-30 19:15:34 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
  Kommentar till text 28411 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
28 Apr 06 09:36, FRANK SCHEIDT wrote to ROY WITT:

 FS> -=> Quoting Roy Witt to Frank Scheidt <=-

 PS>>>>>>>> Typical dumb yank.
 FS>>>>>>>> Seems we both agree in that regard -- considering Yankees to
 FS>>>>>>>> be not the brightest people on earth!
 PS>>>>>>>> That includes you stupid.

 RW>>>>> Look who's calling people family names...LOL!

 FS>>>>>>>> What in the hell causes you to think *I* am a Yankee????
 PS>>>>>>>> Simmer down ole feller, you'll pop something.
 FS>>>>>>> Since I'm not a Yankee, there's no need to simmer in any way
 FS>>>>>>> ...

 SA>>>>>> Whom ever called you a Yankee? Someone called you a "Dumb Yank"
 SA>>>>>> but never a "Yankee". Do you not know the difference?

 RW>>>>> Apparently you don't. There is no difference. Yanks and/or
 RW>>>>> Yankees live in a different area than either Frank or I. We're
 RW>>>>> just Americans of the midwestern variety.

 SA>>>> Boy are you DUMB ... what did he call Frank ?

 RW>>> You dumb fuck! Yanks and Yankees are one and the same.

 SA>>>> It's got nothing to do with 'Yankees'.

 RW>>> I say you're full of shit, but I'm open to an explanation. If you
 RW>>> can't come with one, then I'll expect an apology from you for being
 RW>>> so stupid.
 SA>>> __
 SA>>> Another one with reading difficulties, use your 00 eyes Roy, look
 SA>>> see what he wrote and think back to the war years. It has nothing
 SA>>> to do with your term "Yankees".

 FS>> How many times must it be explained to you, Stewart?  Now lissen
 FS>> up:   "Yank" *means* "Yankee" ... "Yank" is merely a short form
 FS>> for "Yankee" ... why do you find that so difficult to understand?
 FS>> Maybe if I give you another example:  Some people are named
 FS>> "William".  Occasionally they're called "Will".  Got that?
 FS>> "Will" and "William" indicate the same person ...

 RW>> I'm glad you didn't confuse him any further with that analogy by
 RW>> inserting the other variable; Bill...he'd probably think you were
 RW>> offering to pay his. :o)

 FS> Actually "Bill" is far more common than is "Will" but I wanted to
 FS> keep it as simple as possible.  After all, even "Will" might be
 FS> too much for him to understand.  He's probably asking the Dumb
 FS> Swede now, "William died and left a will?  What's *that* got to
 FS> do with it??"

Yeah, but; William Tell us more about the apple.

 FS> Wait!  That "Dumb Swede" thing slipped out, so kindly forgive the
 FS> error ... *I*, OTOH, am so dumb I don't know how to use the
 FS> editor and delete it ... really ... sorry, Dumb Swede ...
 FS> Ooooooops!    I'd better move on ...

Don't worry, that dumb svede isn't fast enough to catch on..


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)