Text 28605, 71 rader
Skriven 2006-05-02 18:40:13 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 28585 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
 BF>> Since Sweden and nor I owe you a shit I don't care

 FS> You (Sweden) don't owe us any WWI war debts, that's true enough, however
 FS> you owe us one *hell* of a lot WRT your share in the actions in Iraq.

We were against it and GWB did this on his own, for the wrong reason, so it's
your problem. Not anyone elses.

 BF>> and since N379P is
 BF>> still flying, now under a new registration, so what?

**
 FS> That was (is?) a truly *minor* matter -- the transportation of terrorists
 FS> to prison ... so let's move on ... [sigh] ...
**
I know of at least 2 cases where the passengers were innocent.

 BF>> Nothing is dead
 BF>> then and we can go on with this untill WE die but I aint gonna do that
 BF>> and that's why I don't respond to you. I have better things to do then to
 BF>> sit here arguing 60 years old shit with a fanatic that can't see longer
 BF>> then his nose.

 FS> If you only knew ...

I do.

 BF>> I have never denied that after you said it. Just wanted to show that Roy
 BF>> IS the moron we all (except you) say he is. Thanks for your help btw.

 FS> That's only *your* interpretation -- and *you* have a lousy reputation,
 FS> after all ...

Above, between  ** and ** you agreed, again.

 BF>> Why don't YOU tell ME why it's ONLY up to *me* to move on.

 FS> *I* *have* moved on.  For example it's only *you* who seems to be so
 FS> fanatically interested in that plane which seems to be transporting
 FS> terrorists.  Why *is* that?  Let's move on ...

You have moved on wrt. N379P since that's negative for you but you haven't
moved on from the war debt which seems to be your fanatical interest.

 BF>>> Why the hell are you and Roy so eager to tell everyone how to behave
 BF>>> when you can't even follow your own device?
 BF>>> A word for that in my dictionary is "hypocrit".

 FS>> I'd suggest you look up a different word, "teacher", perhaps .

 BF>> Are you also telling me what to do but when I do as you do, it's wrong.

 FS> Huh?  Care to explain that?

Sure.
You want me to move on from N379P but when I ask you to move on from the
war debt *I* am the bad guy. Shouldn't this work in both directions?

 BF>> Well, this was a one time answer, now you're on your own again, unless
 BF>> you behave in a civil manner and start to listen to what others have to
 BF>> say without having to force your opinion on to others and start to
 BF>> discuss it as in a dialog
 BF>> instead of a monolog. That manner fits the political echoes but not here.

 FS> I *never* try to force my ideas on others.  I merely express them -- and
 FS> they're almost always damn good ideas!

This is where our opinions differ (again).

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)