Text 29207, 93 rader
Skriven 2006-05-10 11:05:00 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
  Kommentar till text 29150 av Philip Lozier (1:267/169)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
09 May 06 21:39, Philip Lozier wrote to Roy Witt:


 RW>> Could have fooled me. Your diatribes are definately in the
 RW>> 'liberal'
 RW>> category.

 PL> You may think so, but the contents of many of my posts concerning my
 PL> feelings on other things are more towards the conservative side.

LOL! That isn't what they imply to the reader.

 PL> On some issues I lean one way, on others I lean a different way.  So
 PL> therefore, I am neither liberal nor conservative.

Mostly liberal. Hardly ever conservative.

 PL> I know it's hard for you to understand because you're so brainwashed
 PL> by your stubborn old loyalties,

Speaking of brainwashed...look in the mirror.

 PL>  but the least you could do is try to learn some new tricks, you old
 PL> dog ya.

I've got more tricks up my sleeve than you'll ever imagine exist, let
alone learn.

 PL> You don't always have to blindly follow.

I've never blindly followed anything, except a deer trail or two, or four
or ten.

 PL>>> .. nor am I a conservative.
 RW>> I can tell, by your liberal diatribes.
 PL> Blind man...

Attempting to lead those with 20/20 forward vision isn't working for you.

 PL> that's what you are.  Victim of propoganda and blinded to reality and
 PL> decency.

If you continue to believe that, there's no hope for you to come out of
that drunken stupor you've been in since you formulated your liberal
views.

 PL>>>   Get it straight bonzo.
 RW>> Bonzo what?
 PL> Bonzo -you-.  Bedtime you know.

It would help if you could construct a proper sentence.

Get the punctuation correct, bonzo!

 RW>> When you get as learned in the use of the English language as
 RW>> your elders here, you can begin to call others bonzo without any
 RW>> repercussions, shit fer brains.

 PL> Ahhhhhh... losers argument by you once again.

Nahhhhhh. A lozers argument is what you would write here.

 PL>   Just like all the other -snob asses- in the world, you think just
 PL> because you state your oppinions with better grammar that somehow it
 PL> makes them more important and believable.

At least mine is intelligible. Yours wouldn't get you off the tree limb
you learned it on. Yours is like reading the writings of a low class
person who will never get beyond his own 5th grade unintellibible words.

 PL> WELP... Ya know whet... sumtoms jist a 'lil bit o plain ol common
 PL> sinse jist gits all buv yer overANALized figgurin on things. Sumtoms
 PL> it don't, but most toms it shur beats all. Yer edurcashun shur don't
 PL> mean much to the folk in this here REAL world.

See what I mean? Stupid is as stupid says, I always say. You've just
proved it to me.

 PL> You musta really got your ass kicked alot when you were growing up,
 PL> didn't you...

I had a few challengers, but they couldn't cut the mustard.

 PL>  and I don't mean by your folks either, but rather by most of the
 PL> kids your own age.

Even older kids, but their age didn't matter. They went down just like the
kids my age. Your point?


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)