Text 29411, 127 rader
Skriven 2006-05-12 20:27:02 av Philip Lozier (1:267/169)
  Kommentar till text 29332 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
 PL>> YOU FUCKING SLIMEBAG!

 RW> Calling people your family names doesn't do any good. We already
 RW> know
 RW> them.

Oh come on now... that "family names" bit has been run to death.  Is that all
you can come up with?  I've seen it a few times lately so obviously your so
called "witty" responses are getting more and more limited with time as your
mind degresses,

 PL>>   People engaged in a WAR, even though not declared a war by
 PL>> congress, DO NOT deserve the same status as you do,

 RW> Oh? Are they less of a human being than everyone else who's not
 RW> engaged in
 RW> a war?

Misquoting again?

 RW> Did you spit on the Vietnam vets when they returned to the
 RW> US? I'll
 RW> bet you did, you unpatriotic liberal.

Michael Walczyszyn... USMC two tours in Vietnam... a VOLUNTEER not even born in
this country, not drafted.  Went on to be NYPD, and retired
as an instructor for the NYC police academy.  Spent his entire life after
vietnam in the reserves until he retired and participated in advanced
training beyond what normal reserves do.

His daughter, my cousin, is currently a detective NYPD.

Most of this is verifiable maybe with the exception of some of the later
training.

My Uncle, (mothers brother), and a person in my family who the pride I have in
is beyond words.  More of an American than the vast majority I know who have
generations in this country. I admit it... he is a person who I wish I could
have been more like in my life, but I let some opportunities slip me by, and I
-do- regret that... I can EASILY admit that.

Your "oppinion" of what I may have felt about vietnam vets is duly noted, but
in recent posts here I have stated exactly what scumbags I feel some WWII era
vets were (in the VFW) for shunning the vietnam vets, (in other words *ME*
DEFENDING the Vietnam vets), and how they should be ashamed of themselves (the
VFW vermin), so your "oppinion" is effectively
shot in the ass as a falsehood.

 PL>> I'm sure that some of those in active duty who are in FidoNet will
 PL>> truly apeciate your sentiments on that.

I think that those of whom you speak are not like you, and can see that I AM in
favor of *THE WAR* no matter -how- you try and twist it, as that is exactly
what I stated.  They can also see that I support *THEM* in that I feel they
deserve the same credit as "soldiers engaged in a WAR", and those who leave
active duty to be cosdidered "veterans of a WAR", as our WWII friends and those
before them despite the fact that people like you and Frank would say there is
"NO WAR" because congress didn't say so.... which basicly is you and Frank
spitting on THEM.

I'm sure they would appreciate that from -you-, or maybe they just see you for
just how full of shit you are, because at least -one- has expressed to me, in
that lovely thing they call netmail, exactly THAT.

 RW> Speaking of wasted sperm, how's your wife? Still gurgling, I
 RW> presume.

Oh come on now... you CAN do better than that!  You're letting me down Roy.  I
used to see a master debater, but now I only see a masterbater in you.  If you
want to imagine you had my wife, well, go ahead. Everybodies entitled to their
fantasies... especially  somebody like you only gets with those fat old broads
who have hanging lips and a bunghole hanging out, that eat a crate of raw
onions and a keg of chocolate milk for breakfast, and look like they were raped
by a thousand horny pigmies, six sex starved gorillas, and a tasmanian dwarf in
heat... JEEZE... if I were in your shoes, I'd have fantasies too to help me
deal with reality.

 RW> Speaking of fags, how's it down on your knees...need some new pads?

BWAH! HAHAHAHAHA!

 PL>> Fucking jackal.

 RW> You've lost the debate.

You're outa yer fuckin mind!

 RW> We can tell by the way you've gone off the
 RW> deep
 RW> end and the way you're now stooping to calling people names.

Ooooooooh... so witty.  I recall many of -your- name calling posts, both lately
and in the past. Ha-ha-ha... please... don't accuse somebody else of stealing
cookies while crumbs are falling out of your mouth.


 RW> the English language structure and punctuation, you might be able
 RW> to
 RW> overcome your temper long enough to actually say something worth
 RW> reading.

And your mastery of the language has helped you with this... WHEN?

You continually resort to using losers tactics lately. Why is that? Maybe it is
YOU who are on the losing end?  When you admit that, I am sure it will be
clear, as you are such a master of language nobody could possibly
misunderstand.  Even those who are not so well versed as you in the extreme use
of proper grammar already understand what a loser you really are.

BTW... I've noticed MANY spelling errors on your part... just isn;t important
to note them as they occur though.  It really isn;t... it means NOTHING to what
is being said and is only the motive of a LOSER to point them out when they are
ass in the wind to somehow make themselves feel superior and on top of things
when actually they are sinking like lead.

Phil




 RW> Roy
 RW> --- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 RW>  * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA *
 RW> (1:1/22)

--- FMail/Win32 1.60
 * Origin: ==<<FLaSHBaCK-BBS>>== part of the NYCap/Adirondack Netwo (1:267/169)