Text 29772, 77 rader
Skriven 2006-05-16 16:13:54 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
  Kommentar till text 29687 av FRANK SCHEIDT (3:772/100)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
16 May 06 21:14, Stewart Arnett wrote to FRANK SCHEIDT:

 SA> Hello FRANK.

 SA> 15 May 06 07:50, you wrote to ROY WITT:

 FS>> -=> Quoting Roy Witt to Frank Scheidt <=-

 RW>>>>> really surprising, but it's a start for Stewie...Who knows, he
 RW>>>>> may yet convince the uros that barrels rattle.

 FS>>>> Odd, isn't it, he doesn't realize, that for a barrel to *rattle*
 FS>>>> it cannot be empty.  That is, there must be something inside
 FS>>>> *to* rattle.  I wonder why he cannot understand that.

 RW>>>> Heh. He just admitted that he dropped something (a chime) into a
 RW>>>> barrel and it rattled. The chime rattled, of course not the
 RW>>>> barrel, and the sound of the chime bouncing around in the barrel
 RW>>>> eminated from the barrel, making him believe that barrels
 RW>>>> rattle. Interesting how far out of the way of admitting that
 RW>>>> barrels don't rattle, just to save face when he makes stupid
 RW>>>> statements that he can't back up.

 FS>>> But don't you find it somewhat amusing how he's twisting and
 FS>>> turning to cover his ass rather than to admit he spoke carelessly
 FS>>> when he claimed an *empty* barrel could "rattle"?

 RW>>> I sure do...his rambling on is hilarious and then another fool
 RW>>> 'chimes' in and makes it even funnier...LOL!

 FS>> I think his best bet is to re-define "barrel" as, for example, "a
 FS>> container with something loose inside -- something which can
 FS>> easily rattle" ...

Well, here we go. He's now changed the scenario to include something
inside the barrel to make it rattle. However, it's still not the barrel
doing the rattling.

 SA> The words ... loose ... rattle ... think upon them, you are actually
 SA> starting to get an incling of why an empty (for the womble) wooden
 SA> barrel can rattle. No need to re-define "barrel" just think upon the
 SA> ideas wrought from the main word "loose" you have mentioned above.
 SA> Consider a barrel is made from wood and iron, you may just get the
 SA> reason.

 SA> You cannot prove an empty barrel cannot rattle, it is easy to prove
 SA> physicaly, but financialy, someone nearer to you could also do so
 SA> without the travel costs involved ... unless you are paying of course
 SA> ;)  ... though I suppose you would possess the knowse (knowledge) to
 SA> do so yourself. First get a cask of wine ( last one I had was a five
 SA> imperial gallon Graham's port cask ) and drain it. The better the
 SA> wine then of course the better the draining experience. Leave the
 SA> cask / barrel for a few weeks and roll it round the kitchen floor, if
 SA> it stays in one peice it will rattle.

 SA> There now go and shut up and prove to yourself how big an idiot your
 SA> mate the Womble is for misleading you.

 FS>> The poor guy would really *have* us then ... heh heh heh ...

 SA> No need, you have *got* yourself.

 SA>  ... end of subject ... I have won ....

 SA> Stewart

 SA> --- GoldED/2 3.0.1
 SA>  * Origin: The RockBBS Auckland NZ 64-9-5799604 (3:772/100)

Roy

 "We can expect little else from power-mongers who would have no power to
 monger if we had our way. They have to believe that authority and
 obedience are essential in order to justify their own crimes to
 themselves".
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)