Text 30424, 83 rader
Skriven 2006-05-24 11:03:00 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av PHILIP LOZIER
Ärende: Canadian
================
-=> Quoting Philip Lozier to Roy Witt <=-

 RW> 22 May 06 02:41, STEWART ARNETT wrote to STEWART ARNETT:
 
 RW>           This message was originally addressed to Frank Scheidt
 RW>                  and was originally sent by Phil Lozier
 
 RW>                 ---------------------------------------
 
 RW> = FIDONEWS (1:1/22) =============
 RW> ======================================
 RW>  Msg  : 25337 of 25778                      Uns
 RW>  From : Philip Lozier               1:267/169       14 May 06
 RW> 19:04:26
 RW>  To   : FRANK SCHEIDT
 RW>  Subj : Canadian "Skills"
 RW> =================================
 RW> ======================================
 RW> Blah, blah, blah.
 
 RW> You've lost.  You just can't handle it.  You're a bufoon.  Ah...
 RW> there's
 RW> the
 RW> next key.
 
 RW> <next>
 
 -=>>> Quoting Philip Lozier to Frank Scheidt <=-


 PL> Now not HIS (Frank's) Reply to that very message...

 <clip>


 PL> ----[ Fido-Fidonews Echo
 PL> ]---------------------------------------------------- On: Tue 16 May
 PL> 2006 10:47a   (Rcvd: Tue 16 May 2006  3:32p) By: FRANK SCHEIDT
 PL> To: PHILIP LOZIER
 PL> Re: Canadian "Skills"
 PL> St: Rcvd Replied
 PL> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
 PL> ------- @MSGID: 1:123/140 040627b1
 PL> @TID: PX/Win v3.0pr5 PX96-0466M2
 PL> @TZUTC: -0400
 -=> Quoting Philip Lozier to Frank Scheidt <=-
 
 PL> Blah, blah, blah.
 
 PL> You've lost.  You just can't handle it.  You're a bufoon.  Ah...
 PL> there's the next key.

 PL> <next>
 
 PL>>> And *I* believe no self respecting person would insult the lives of
 PL>>> those
 PL>>> who gave themselves willingly on behalf of their country by saying they
 PL>>> weren't in a "war".  You've spelled out for me that you don't see a
 PL> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

 PL> </CLIP>

 PL> And THERE ya have it.  Everything ABOVE the "<NEXT>" showed PL> as the
 PL> text of whom was being quoted, but the "<NEXT>" in HIS reponse to that
 PL> message had NO such indication.  As shown, as HE posted it, it
 PL> indicates an insertion BY HIM to the message he was reponding to.
 PL> Wether or not it is the same word that was there or not, it indicates
 PL> that -my- next had been excluded from the quoted text, and him
 PL> inserting a new one, trying to be a wise ass, and then later him LYING
 PL> about it. 
 PL> What say ye on that Oh Great Uncle Bulgaria, King of the Wombles?

Is there no lower limit to the trivia you post here?  The 
"<NEXT>" think you keep draging up is *not* mine ... how 
difficult is that for you to understand?

You screwed up so let's move on ... [sigh] ...

... "One ring to rule them all ... ": Lord of the Rings

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)