Text 31584, 76 rader
Skriven 2006-06-12 13:40:58 av Janis Kracht (1:261/38)
     Kommentar till en text av Nathan Prugh
Ärende: Re: Pickled Pirates Prop
================================
Hi again Nathan,

>>>> one I might add that contains more contributions from Zone 1 members
>>>> than anyone else (look at the index).
>>
>>> You conveniently left out this:
>>>>> Like Shannon is claiming with respect to my articles.
>>> Obviously my claim to copyright restricts itself to my articles.
>>
>> And your article is published well within your rights to it, i.e, no one is
>> changing a hair in your article nor removing it from the composite work. No
>> one is claiming they wrote your article.  Check our your country's
>> copyright law regarding composite works as of 2001 and who it has
>> agreements with.
>>

> Yep! You go Janis!!! :-)

I have dealt with copyright, copyleft and multitudes of inferences over the
years because of the work I do with the FileGate archives.  I don't claim to be
a lawyer or know every aspect of copyright law, but I know what's legal and
what's nonsense :)  I've worked with some pretty famous International copyright
lawyers over the last several years :)

>>>> If someone removed all the other text from one of the distributed
>>>> newsletters and only posted YOUR article you might have some grounds
>>>> for complaining. Otherwise, Fidonews is and remains a composite work,
>>>> published in it's entirety as described in the body of it's
>>>> publication.
>>
>>> And in the epilog it says that indiviual authors retain there rights.
>>
>> That's right, you do retain your rights to your article, in that no one can
>> claim that particular article as theirs, nor can they distribute or publish
>> it alone without the rest of fidonews, nor can they include it some other
>> composite work.  No one has done any of these.
>>

> 100% true :-)

Yep.

>>> The copyright of my articles is mine and so republishing them requires my
>>> permission.
>>> Shannon does not have my permission.
>>
>> He's not republishing your article.  He is displaying his own copy of it as
>> are the many members of Fidonet.
>> If Shannon sent me a copy of Fidonews to send out over the internet as a
>> "new" composite work that HE published named Shannon's News, and it was
>> distributed by the FileGate, that would be different.
>>

> I agree 100% :-)

It's too obvious to those that are not looking at this with an agenda.

>>>> You are wasting time and bandwidth with this nonsense,

>>> As I have told you and others I do not coinsider it nonsence. I am dead
>>> serious, This ex-Eurotrash pacifict pussy ran out of cheecks to turn. It i
>>> time to make a stand. I will not have my articles published on the same
>> websit
>>> as Shannon's hate campaign.
>>
>> Tough.  Don't write any more articles for Fidonews.

> High Five-O Janis!!! :-)

It's a simple solution. :)

Take care,
Janis

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)