Text 33531, 113 rader
Skriven 2006-07-15 13:20:52 av Ross Cassell (1:123/456)
  Kommentar till text 33527 av Gregory J. Deyss (1:267/150)
Ärende: Change
==============
Hello Gregory!

15 Jul 06 12:26, you wrote to me:

 RC>> I see you have backed off the argument over the buildings
 RC>> designs on what planes it could take.

 GD> backed off? No not at all. They way these buildings were constructed
 GD> in is unlikly that that would fall in a pancake fashion they way they
 GD> did.

You act like the failure occurred with the very top floor?

I once fell through shelving once, while walking on the top shelf preparing for
inventory, the shelving was made out of that particle board, apparently I
walked onto a weakened section, and I fell though, I hit the next shelf and it
broke and I fell through that one too, ergo pancaked.

The planes struck the towers in the 90-100 floor range (approx), each tower was
110 floors. If the failure occurs at the 95th floor for sake of argument you
have the weight of the 15 floors plus the roof coming down on it, the weight of
floors 96-110 roof falling 10 to 12 feet to slam onto floor 94 and that force
magnifies exponentially with each floor.

If I stood on a ladder 15 foot in the air and dropped a 10 pound box for you to
catch, thats ok, now what if this weight increases each time, is there a weight
in which you could not catch, why yes there would be, this is what the 95th or
94th floor experienced with the already leapfrogged weight magnified by its 10
to 12 foot freefall (space between floors), therefore the pancaking.

Another anology is you might be able to support 200 pounds on your shoulders,
but you wouldnt be able to if you had to "catch it from a fall".

Gregory, I keep the History and discovery channels on mostly, I have seen a
billion documentaries and none of them support warped conspiracy theories.

 GD> There is only one logical explanation for this.

and that is... ??

Wait!

Using technology gleaned from the 1947 Alien Roswell crash, the US Govt had a
modulated phased tachyon beam fired onto the towers to cause molecular decay,
whilst firing another gravitational confinement beam to make sure the towers
fell straight down..

Yeah thats the explaination, it just has to be!

You say there has to be a logical explaination, yet you offer none.

Is your mind that weak?


 RC>> Blackboxes are not indestructible, man has yet to
 RC>> construct anything that is indestructible, the only thing
 RC>> that man can create that is such is his ability to
 RC>> destruct.

 GD> Yeah I know what you stating, and where your coming from anything that
 GD> is made by man, is not indestructible. Every other plane crash these
 GD> were recovered not in NYC and not at the amazing pentagon.

I told you that flight 77's blackbox and data recorders were recovered on
09/14/2001. flight 77 was the one that hit the Pentagon. I also told you that
Flight 93's data recorder was also recovered, flight 93 was the one that
crashed into the ground in PA.

Your weak brain prohibits you from seeing this.

 RC>> Well well well, thats 2 of the four planes that had
 RC>> blackbox and flight data recorders recovered, you said
 RC>> NONE of them were recovered.

 GD> If this is true what have we learned by them and why to do public
 GD> outcry is this information not availble.

Because weak brained people like you are too lazy to go look for it, for you
people its easier to infer assinine conspiracy theories and just repeat them ad
naseum.

It took me all of 5 minutes to find the information on flight 77 & 93, I wont
tell you how, because I want to help rehabilitate the weak minded, I am forcing
you to use your brain to exercise it.

Have you read the 911 commisions report?

 RC>> I wouldnt expect much recovery from the other 2 that
 RC>> struck the towers, if the heat from the fires was stout
 RC>> enough to have weakened the structure to trigger or
 RC>> contribute to their collapsed, I imagine the recorders
 RC>> were toast.

 GD> Wrong again.....

I was never wrong to begin with, therefore I aint wrong "again"..

 GD> The core of the structurally similar Windsor Building in Madrid
 GD> withstood an 800øC inferno for more than 18 hours without failing, and
 GD> since no 800øC inferno existed in WTC 1 it is impossible to believe
 GD> that heat caused the core of this building to fail.

Then you havent read anything and you are incapable of believing otherwise,
your mind is weak.

==
Ross
Fidonet Feeds Or Fidonet In Your Newsreader! http://www.easternstar.info
Portal To My Personal Blogs And A Discussion Forum: http://www.cassell.us
Email: rcassell[at]gmail[dot]com
... How does Michael Jackson pick his nose? From a catalog!
--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-30413
 * Origin: The Eastern Star - Spartanburg, SC USA (1:123/456)