Text 33620, 50 rader
Skriven 2006-07-16 12:57:12 av Gregory J. Deyss (1:267/150)
  Kommentar till text 33546 av Jeff Smith (1:14/0)
Ärende: Change
==============
 JS> Hello Gregory.

 JS> 15 Jul 06 12:26, you wrote to Ross Cassell:

 RC>>> I see you have backed off the argument over the buildings
 RC>>> designs on what planes it could take.
 GD>> backed off? No not at all. They way these buildings were constructed
 GD>> in is unlikly that that would fall in a pancake fashion they way they
 GD>> did. There is only one logical explanation for this.


 JS>     Then you need to do some more research of the facts
 JS> to prevent
 JS> drawing the wrong conclusion. I don't know that much
 JS> about structual
 JS> engineering but I am capable of seeing why and how the
 JS> WTC collapsed.
 JS> What is your excuse for jumping to the wrong conclusion?
It is not logical for the buildings to fall in a pancake fashion because of the
way that they were designed. There is only one way to force this to occur and
that be charges as used in a controled demolition.

FACTIOD The melting point of IRON is as follows
Melting Point: 1535.0 øC (1808.15 K, 2795.0 øF)

We have assumed that the entire 3,500 gallons of jet fuel was confined to just
one floor of the World Trade Center,
that the jet fuel burnt with perfect efficency, that no
hot gases left this floor, that no heat escaped this floor
by conduction and that the steel and concrete had an
unlimited amount of time to absorb all the heat.
Then it is impossible that the jet fuel, by itself, raised
the temperature of this floor more than 257? C (495? F).
Now this temperature is nowhere near high enough to even
begin explaining the World Trade Center Tower collapse.
It is not even close to the first critical temperature of 600? C (1,100? F)
where steel loses about half its strength
and it is nowhere near the quotes of 1500? C that we
constantly read about in our lying media.
"In the mid-1990s British Steel and the Building Research
Establishment performed a series of six experiments at
Cardington to investigate the behavior of steel frame
buildings. These experiments were conducted in a simulated,
eight-story building. Secondary steel beams were not protected.
Despite the temperature of the steel beams reaching 800-900?
C (1,500-1,700? F) in three of the tests (well above the
traditionally assumed critical temperature of 600? C (1,100? F),
no collapse was observed in any of the six experiments."
--- FMail/Win32 1.60
 * Origin: Capital Station BBS Troy, NY  Telnet://csbbs.dyndns.org (1:267/150)