Text 35715, 90 rader
Skriven 2006-08-02 09:00:59 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
  Kommentar till text 35641 av Carol Shenkenberger (6:757/1)
Ärende: a
=========
02 Aug 06 16:47, Carol Shenkenberger wrote to Roy Witt:

 CS> *** Quoting Roy Witt from a message to Carol Shenkenberger ***

 RW>> Note that Matt no longer has a listed phone number as an RC nor a
 RW>> mail mover. He's now in the same class with Al Robre and Brenda
 RW>> Donovan and their regions are slowly dying, while those regions with
 RW>> listed phones *C positions seem to be stable and/or growing. I
 RW>> submitted my choice o nets, since he's obviously not going to issue
 RW>> a RIN, and have CC'd to and the NC a net in South Texas. I had to
 RW>> route it to all of you. How do you want to bet that it goes
 RW>> un-answered by either the RC or NC?

 CS> Dont know but I have no netmail from you.

It would come to your 6/0 node, routed through Dale...

 CS> I'll check the email account you might have though and see if it's
 CS> there.

I didn't send it via email. Email isn't fidonet.

 CS> My 'hotmail' would be the only one you have right?

Which ever one I had, I can't find...

 CS> On the RIN, apparently he did offer one and you declined.

He didn't offer it outright. He offered it if I had a problem with either
of the NCs he listed. I didn't want it, as there is a net in SA that
should be listed, but his refusal to do that has all but disbanded those
who said they'd like to join Fido. Most of them have decided to go
elsewhere (not fido) and the one who wanted to stay will wait until I'm
listed to point.

 CS> At need for now, perhaps you should ask again for one?

I already sent him a netmail stating which net I'd accept a node in. I had
to route it, since he has no listed phone number.

 CS> On the netseg, You've got the action on your end to provide him
 CS> contact information for those prospective nodes you say you have or
 CS> have them contact him. That is fair.

Sure it is, but they were reluctant to allow it to be sent to anyone
outside of 387...they already know how Matt can be.

 CS> My hotmail, if you need it is:
 CS> shenks_express(at)fillintherest(dot)com (fillintherest should be
 CS> obvious).

Check you email...I just sent a copy of the netmail there.

 CS>> email you so you could check it out.

 RW>> He's out of luck...all but one has reconsidered because of Matt's
 RW>> atti and I'll feed him as a point or turn him over to someone else,
 RW>> outside R19.

 CS> Ok.  If you have trouble finding others who they can point off of,
 CS> have them contact me but they will need another as a 'feed' and i'll
 CS> need a way to be able to pass over any netmail to them even if it's a
 CS> long delay when I'm at sea (I cant reach my BBS Netmail at sea, just
 CS> things crossed to email by Bob Seaborn and things sent to Dale
 CS> Shipp's address).

There's only one who'll want to point, the rest have opted to go
elsewhere.

 CS> Grin, when at sea, I essentially operate as a point off Dale Shipp
 CS> via QWK mailer reader exports.  Functionally it's as if a user but
 CS> with full sysop echo accesses and netmail.  Extremely convient for me
 CS> and totally automated at his end.

Since these people are still locals, they won't have a problem like that.

 RW>> Contrary to the Dossche's statement that I'm not obliged to you, I
 RW>> tha you for sticking with it.

 CS> No problem.  I dont agree with everything you've done but we've
 CS> always been able to work with each other and just chat with 'life and
 CS> stuff'.  I'm not on any witch hunts here.  Just aint my style ;-)
 CS>                                        xxcarol

I know...you're about the only one who isn't on a witch hunt.


\%/itt
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)