Text 35829, 77 rader
Skriven 2006-08-03 09:47:05 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
  Kommentar till text 35798 av Carol Shenkenberger (6:757/1)
Ärende: a
=========
03 Aug 06 20:32, Carol Shenkenberger wrote to Roy Witt:

 CS> *** Quoting Roy Witt from a message to Carol Shenkenberger ***

 RW>>> route it to all of you. How do you want to bet that it goes
 RW>>> un-answered by either the RC or NC?

 CS>> Dont know but I have no netmail from you.

 RW>> It would come to your 6/0 node, routed through Dale...

 CS> Ok, sorry for being slow to check the hotmail.  I saw it there today
 CS> when you crossed it over.  Dale Ross right?  I'll drop him and Bob
 CS> Seaborn a netmail as i dont think either read here, or if they do,
 CS> it's just occasional reading.

Yes, Dale Ross. I have to call him tomorrow anyway, so I'll have him check
his sidelined stuff again. That's where he found Janis' message about the
ZIN...

 CS>> On the RIN, apparently he did offer one and you declined.

 RW>> He didn't offer it outright. He offered it if I had a problem with
 RW>> eit of the NCs he listed. I didn't want it, as there is a net in SA
 RW>> that

 CS> I am a little confused but thats ok.  I have a feeling it was longer
 CS> ago, not something in the last 2 weeks.

It was right here in the echo.

 CS>> On the netseg, You've got the action on your end to provide him
 CS>> contact information for those prospective nodes you say you have or
 CS>> have them contact him. That is fair.

 RW>> Sure it is, but they were reluctant to allow it to be sent to anyone
 RW>> outside of 387...they already know how Matt can be.

 CS> Ah well.  Water under the bridge now.  It's strange here too.  Terry
 CS> Roati is turning his domain over to Eddie Salonga (I need to email
 CS> Eddie). Lawrence Fan hasnt answered back (might be miffed at me, I
 CS> had long ago taken out that extra nodenumber set he seemed to be
 CS> looking for) and Anatoli says he'll be online 'soon' (reminded him to
 CS> pickup mail from Bob soonest before Bob has to delete it).  Anatoli
 CS> said 'about a month'.  We'll have to see how that goes.

With the size of the nodelist waning over the years, I don't see why
anyone would be refused an extra node number. If it served some personal
purpose, it should be left alone. It certainly isn't going to bother
anyone else by being there. Well, accept for the policy wankers like
Vlist, who think it'd be node stuffing.

 RW>>> Contrary to the Dossche's statement that I'm not obliged to you, I
 RW>>> tha you for sticking with it.

 CS>> No problem.  I dont agree with everything you've done but we've
 CS>> always been able to work with each other and just chat with 'life
 CS>> and stuff'.  I'm not on any witch hunts here.  Just aint my style
 CS>> ;-)

 RW>> I know...you're about the only one who isn't on a witch hunt.

 CS> You'd be suprised at a few netmail's i've gotten here.  There's some
 CS> folks you do not normally get along with who at least this time,
 CS> agree you deserve more than 1 week to settle this out as long as you
 CS> are working on it.  Evil Grin, they'd not appreciate me if i told you
 CS> who so I wont.  I'm just gonna leave you dangling...
 CS>                                        xxcarol

I'm not a dangler...I appreciate that there are folks like that, but I
don't have a problem with not knowing.


               R\%/itt

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)