Text 35904, 141 rader
Skriven 2006-08-04 00:37:24 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
  Kommentar till text 35885 av Carol Shenkenberger (6:757/1)
Ärende: Nodenumber?
===================
04 Aug 06 12:27, Carol Shenkenberger wrote to Roy Witt:

 CS> *** Quoting Roy Witt from a message to Carol Shenkenberger ***

 RW>>> ,6,SATX_Alamo_Area_Network,Las_Brisas_TX,Roy_Witt,1-830-620-0071,30
 RW>>> 0 ,M M,XX,V21

 RW>> Hmmmm, it seems that Vlist didn't get all of the number...LOL! There
 RW>> i is, intact. I guess I don't need to send an update.

 CS> Nope!  Origionals are clean too.  Truncated somehow on quote I guess.
 CS> Not quoted here but QMM flag?  Not ringing a bell.  Would it be one
 CS> of the new ones that Z1 has discussed?

No, I think that flag is quite old. (searching) Yeup, here's a section of
nodelist.364 for the year 1994.

;S
;S The following software is qualified to
;S use the appropriate file request flag
;S according to information provided by
;S developers:
;S
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S | Flag      Software Package        |
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S |  XA  Frontdoor   1.99b and lower  |
;S |      Frontdoor   2.01  and higher |
;S |      Dutchie     2.90c            |
;S |      Binkleyterm 2.1   and higher |
;S |      D'Bridge    1.2   and lower  |
;S |      TIMS                         |
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S |  XB  Binkleyterm 2.0              |
;S |      Dutchie     2.90b            |
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S |  XC  Opus        1.1              |
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S |  XP  Seadog                       |
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S |  XR  Opus        1.03             |
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S |  XW  Fido        12N   and higher |
;S |      Tabby                        |
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S |  XX  D'Bridge    1.30             |
;S |      Frontdoor   1.99c/2.00       |
;S |      InterMail   2.01             |
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S |  None       QMM                   |
;S |-----------------------------------|
;S


 CS> I'm very out of date with such as they discuss it in the Z1C echo
 CS> apparently and i do not have that one here.

It's probably never been used in any of your segments.

 CS> --sideline, Janis said i'm welcome to read that Z1C echo but it
 CS> caused a little confusion once when I posted on a thread and it's
 CS> easier to not have it than try to remember to 'not post' and
 CS> automating that on the sysop level account I use is just too much
 CS> hassle for me to bother with.

That's odd. She's allowed other nodes from other zones to post there, why
not you? There's really not much going on there, those who got run out of
the sysop 'fight echoes' have moved there. Some of them haven't been
posting anywhere else. I even posted there a couple of times, this after
having my feed cut a long time ago.

 CS>   Doable with TG, but I dont want to be bothered to remind myself of
 CS> the right flags to tag that one echo with.  Anyways, thats why I was
 CS> asking if QMM was some new one that has been tested or discussed in
 CS> the last 5 years I've been away.

Well, you can rest assured that QMM is an OLD flag, but seldom used...btw,
my nodelisting doesn't have that one in it, it's got an XX instead.

 CS>> Could there be some of those netmail trackers causing problems?

 RW>> Probably...I suppose I could use a 'node app listing' to send
 RW>> it...tha should get through the trackers.

 CS> No need now (echomail delay).  Had replies to my netmail within just
 CS> a couple of hours and they have it all passed around now.  Might even
 CS> be time to try a poll on that NC fellow?  Gather he might be directly
 CS> reachable for you?

Yeah, long distance at 300b...if it worked. I guess I'll have to upgrade.
Trouble is, there aren't any in this small berg to be had, I'll have to go
to SA to get one. I saw a box full of desktop modems where I bought my
laptop, $5 each. There might be a good one in that box...

 CS> Being it's Friday here, I doubt you will be listed this week.  Just
 CS> not enough time left due to the accidently sidelined application.
 CS> Hope the NC isnt on summer vacation or something too!

Not to worry, he got it listed. Don't know if that was John's seg or Matt
added it.

 CS>> It shouldnt but it's also almost impossible to route a netmail from
 CS>> inside Z1 to me, and not get here.

 RW>> I know...but it shouldn't be.

 CS> Well, happens and no biggie.  I was more worried once I had your
 CS> email, that someone wasnt set right for Z6.

Hmmmm. Matt said it went through his system to John...I wonder where else
it got to.

 CS> It's not like we are a big place but all netmail destined for Z6
 CS> nodes needs to get to either Janis or Bob. Once it gets to one of
 CS> them, it's going to get either held forpickup, or passed to the other
 CS> one and held for pickup.  All the existing nodes except Lawrence Fan
 CS> have a known path to at least hold mail for. If someone netmails
 CS> Lawrence, I imagine it would be passed to me and i'd export it over
 CS> to email for him.

You can't list his email?

 CS> Anyways, we can pretty much close the issue out now.  Seems it was
 CS> your outbound address and something at Dale's that made the 'oopsie
 CS> sideline'.

 CS> I shelled and checked my nobogus, nope.  Only filter is Darryl
 CS> Salter. He's been gone for ages.
 CS>                                        xxcarol

No filter at fault at Dale's system, he hasn't used NB for 2 or 3 years
now.


               R\%/itt

               A Coyote will beat a Rabbit every time.


--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)