Text 37113, 89 rader
Skriven 2006-08-20 19:30:05 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
  Kommentar till text 36996 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Frank - take a break (was CELEBRATION!)
===============================================
20 Aug 06 14:42, Björn Forsström wrote to Jeff Smith:


 RC>>>> Bush tells people how it is and the way its going to be.

 BF>>> Of course I could argue with you about this but that would only
 BF>>> make me look like the anti-American Shannon have made you all
 BF>>> believe I am so I leave it.

 JS>>      As far as he goes he does have a point. As a president Bush is
 JS>> alot more decisive and willing to do what he thinks needs to be
 JS>> done. Clinton on the other hand would say one thing but faulter when
 JS>> it came time for actions instead of words. That is not to say that I
 JS>> agree with a large part of the way Bush has handled things though.

(Bush and/or HSA)

 BF> Of course everyone have both good and bad sides but all we see and
 BF> hear over here

Ahhh, the propagandists heavily engaged in fooling the uros. That sounds a
bit familiar, like it's been done dozens of times before.

 BF> is how he exceeds his authorities like scanning all mail and email
 BF> for Americans who communicates overseas

No he doesn't. It's legal for government agencies to use public
information to gather inteligence on those who would be plotting a
terrorist act. Known Al Queda phone numbers have their own attraction.

 BF> although a judge have said that it's against the constitution.

Not quite...That judge put a stepping stone in their path. They have to
get permission from Congress to do what they do. Congress just has to pass
legislation to make it easier to do now, rather than have to step over
that stone again.

 BF> Still he wants to do it and will appeal against it because America is
 BF> at war and the only war that's going on is in Iraq

Well, there is a declared war on terrorism...not only by the Prez, but by
our Congress...although there are some rather screwed up people who voted
for that war now denying they ever did. The Congressional record shows
otherwise...

 BF>  and that isn't even declared as a war.

No need...the war on terrorism is faught wherever there are terrorists.

 BF> If that isn't wanting to be a dictator I don't know what is

I expect you don't have a clue about a lot of things...this one is no
exception.

 BF>  and I don't understand how you all can accept it.

Because we wish to be safe from terrorists...unlike ya'll...

 BF> And the judge that went against him is appointed by him so obviously
 BF> he doesn't care what anyone eslse have to say.

That judge didn't go against him, he just suggested the correct procedure
to make it easier.

 BF> If Bush gets his will through, will that be the end for Fido for you
 BF> since here we're rather anti-Bush?

Hell no...this isn't modern day urope where freedom of speech doesn't
exist as it does in the US.

 BF> Or will you that doesn't agree with him 100% end up on a black-list?

There is not blacklist of those citizens who dont' agree with him...if
there was, we'd all be in deep doodoo. I like what he does, but I don't
always agree with his methods.

 BF> And what about the right to free speech?

What about it?

 BF> Has he really been thinking this through and have you?

Of course.

               R\%/itt


--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)