Text 40397, 216 rader
Skriven 2006-10-02 05:16:00 av BOB KLAHN (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av ROSS CASSELL
Ärende: The bad news is...
==========================
 BK>>  Uh... you seem to be trying to suppress any dissenting views. If
 BK>>  you have a differing opinion, post it. Otherwise, it doesn't
 BK>>  matter if you have an opinion or not, we will never know.

 RC> I only seek to suppress you.

 Ah a fanatic, but a focused fanatic.

 RC>>> Thought so..

 BK>>   Then why did you say what you did?

 RC> Because you are an outsider, you seek to foist yourself
 RC> onto others.

 This is Fido. Unless this is your private echo, you are way out
 of line calling anyone an outsider. Oh, if you have membership
 rules, where do we get our cards?

 RC>>> Many of the Euro's feel the same way about Iraq/Bush that
 RC>>> you do, which should not be a revelation, that does not
 RC>>> mean this echo is yet another depository for your cutting
 RC>>> and pasting.

 BK>>  Since I didn't, your entire line is irrelevant.

 RC> Dont matter, tell us what you have posted about the
 RC> Fidonews or its editor, I can, you cannot, why is that?

 Look at your part in this thread. You are going on and on to
 tell me not to post something once? Now that is dumb.

 RC>>> Not every echo is ripe for the political debate you so
...
 BK>>  Like I find in this one?

 RC> This echo isnt ripe, if anything else, you seek to make it
 RC> worse.

 If it's not ripe, how can I make it worse?

 RC>>> So why would you contribute to that, knowing what this
 RC>>> echoes purpose is for, you let little Lofaso tell you to
...
 BK>>  You do realize that comment is another that makes no sense,
 BK>>  don't you?

 BK>>  What has Lofaso have to do with it?

 RC> I suspect he, maybe Wayne the welfare fraud mentioned it,

 You complain to me about posting politics? Then you post that?
 Are you so blind you don't see what you just posted has no more
 to do with fidonews, and is incindiary besides? You are the one
 bringing down this echo.

 RC> as you can see, neither fit in here real too well either,
 RC> all 3 of you cannot grasp the history in here.

 The only history I am seeing now is you all over the field,
 spreading your bile.

...

 BK>>  Uh... anyone who doesn't understand what I posted has not been
 BK>>  paying attention to the world.

 RC> Unlike you and Wayne, no one else lets politics govern
 RC> their lives and permit it to paralyze them. But unlike you

 Again, you bring someone else in as if that really supports your
 absurd tirade. You are the one polluting this echo. Wayne has
 zero to do with what I post.

 RC> I would hate to be either of you two.

 You would find it exceedingly difficult knowing what you are
 talking about for a change, now wouldn't you?

 I wonder if you are fool enough to trip over that one.

...

 BK>>  Gee... and I thought what I posted made sense. Sorry if you
 BK>>  didn't understand it.

 RC> Nothing you post makes sense, its just you repeating your
 RC> usual partisan nonsense, tell me if I am wrong, you think

 You are wrong. I gave my analysis of the situation in Pakistan.
 The only introduction of US politics was to mention how we are
 harmed by the claims of WMDs in Iraq, now disproved, and Powell
 and Armitage, both of whom are out of the administration now,
 and neither of whom is considered a Bush adherent.

 All of which is true, but only lightly partisan. Unless you are
 a Pakistani loyalist, that is. In which case, you have a real
 problem.

 RC> everyone in the USA should be a democrat? (Oh, and I dont
 RC> think everyone should be the opposite)

 If everyone was a democrat there would be no reason for anyone
 to be a democrat as there would be no opposition to define
 yourself against.

 RC>>> No, I object to you as a newcomer treating this echo as a
 RC>>> political debate echo.. Especially when you know it is not.

 BK>>  I joined in the obvious drift. Newcomer or old timer, what's the
 BK>>  difference where that is concerned?

 RC> You dont understand the core drift, you see blurbs of

 Ah, the core drift? Anything like the drift of the magma core of
 the Earth? Slow but inevitable.

 RC> political crap come out and assumed that this is
 RC> pol_disorder or some such.

 I see much more political crap than echo tag topical crap, and
 much crap from you.

 Hell, in this thread alone you have heavily trashed the echo.

 BK>>>>  Uh... read the echo name. Debate. Not poltical debate. Not
 BK>>>>  philosophical debate. Just debate. We were all snow white, but
 BK>>>>  we drifted. To Quote a virginal movie star of the 30s, 40s,
 BK>>>> 50s,
 BK>>>>  etc.

 RC>>> But what if the topic drift was about how you killed your
 RC>>> first wife and it was dwelled on...

 BK>>  Personal attacks, and esp libel, are banned.

 RC> Then I made my point..

 No, did I launch a personal attack on you? Are personal attacks
 forbidden in this echo? If so, you face moderator sanctions for
 what you have said in this thread.
...
 BK>>  I am here to check out what that person said. I have come to
 BK>>  understand what he was talking about. Too many people playing
 BK>>  moderator.

 RC> Which is not your concern or his..

 Which is what I was checking out. Whether you think it's my
 concern or not.

 BK>>  And regardless of the echo title, it is what it is. Like I said,
 BK>>  I don't see you moderating any of the other "drift". Which

...

 RC> Not at all, there is plenty of filth in here without seeing
 RC> horseflies like you showing up out of the blue.

 Let's see, I post a well thought out analysis of the situation
 in Pakistan, and you class that as filth? Are you an
 anti-pakistani bigot? Or just full of it?

 RC>>> I suppose you would, Lefto wingnuts like you have no ethics.

 BK>>  Wingnuts are, by defintion, on the right.

 RC> No, threaded stock can have right handed threads or left
 RC> handed threads, you are a lefto wingnut.

 Wingnuts are by definition on the right.

 BK>>  Us moderates are just full of ethics. Rightwingnuts are full of
 BK>>  it, but we don't want to get into what they are full of.

 RC> You are no moderate. you are however a moderator of the
 RC> Debate echo.

 Where we don't tolerate your type personal attacks.

 BK>>>>  Is there anyone in the Win 95 echo these days?

 RC>>> Plenty, all versions of windows gets discussed in there..

 BK>>  Aha! Topic drift!

 RC> Shows how much you know..

 I was pulling your chain. I don't care what goes on there.

...

 RC> The users and moderators of WIN95 echo decided to open the
 RC> echo up to all versions of windows, those before or since

 That's nice. I hate microsoft, but I still have to use there
 stuff, so I'll think about it.

...

 RC> I have seen you talk the tech talk, you do it quite well
 RC> and I am sure you and I could find common ground there, why
 RC> not come over to that echo and lets edumacate the DOS
 RC> weenies!! <g>

 I am an old dos man. I believe Windows was a satanic plot by the
 anti-Christ, (gates), to prepare the world for hell on earth.

 But that's just my opinion.

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... It would be better for mankind... that the rich be tossed into the sea. A.C
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)