Text 41124, 55 rader
Skriven 2006-10-11 22:32:01 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
  Kommentar till text 41116 av Jeff Smith (1:14/0)
Ärende: DUD-file
================
Hello Jeff!

On Wednesday October 11 2006 10:15, you wrote to me:

 JS>>>      What makes you think that a copyright is nessesary?

 MV>> Why do I have to justify it? The copyright *is* mine. Why are you
 MV>> questioning my right to explicitly state it?

 JS>      Why are you so resistant to answer simple questions?

Because I have learned that my answers will be lifted out of context, twisted
around and used against me. If not now than two years later.

You have just witnessed it in my exchange with ST.

 JS> I simply asked why you thought it was nessesary.

No, that was not a simple question. It was a question with a presumption.
Therefore possibly a trick question.

 JS>   Where did I question your rights?

You implied it by making the presumption that there must be a necessity. A
necessity that, according to you, I need to explain.

 JS>  Why is it that you don't want people to know your real reasons.

Why must there be a reason at all? Why do you presume there is an agenda
attached to a simple copyright notice? Why does a simple copyright notice make
me a target for the inquisition?

Why is it so important for you to make an issue out of this?

 JS> Usually one only conceils that that they are fraid of others finding
 JS> out.

If you took a stroll in the park and the inquisition challenged you with the
question "why did you think it is necessary to walk in the park?", what would
you answer?

 JS>>> If you would like to know why people feel like giving ya the
 JS>>> digit. Glance in the mirror.

 MV>> Are you sure you are not an alias of Roy Witt?

 JS>     Gosh, now you have insulted one of us. <g>

Why are you so resistant to answer simple questions?


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060315
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)