Text 42644, 78 rader
Skriven 2006-11-15 06:35:02 av shannon talley (1:275/311)
     Kommentar till en text av bob klahn
Ärende: Re: Ego Centrism.
=========================
Hello again Bob,

> I read your explanation. It makes no sense, but I read it. What
> you wrote makes zero sense as an explanation. Esp considering
> how what you wrote fits in so well with those who bash anyone
> who is not toeing the Bush line 100%.

Again, that joke was over your head Bob.  However, I'm surprised that after 
all of this time you still haven't got it. (FYI, Bush wasn't around in 
WWII).

> Then why can't you tell them from non-radical Muslims? Is this a

I defy you to show me the words I wrote that indicated I couldn't tell them 
apart Bob.  This is another example of one of your deceptive replies.

>>> of the Islamic world. You didn't say Arabs, you said Muslims.

Bob, most Arabs are muslim.

> You do realize that means nothing also, don't you? How about
> how Arabs differ from Malaysians, who differ from Indians, who
> differ from South Africans, who differ from Chinese, who differ
> from Turks? All you did was compare Middle Eastern Muslims.

Yes, because the conversation is about "RADICAL ISLAM" Not Malaysians or 
specifically Arabs.

> IOW, I was not wrong, thanks.

Neither was "I" -- even though you tried to say I was, but your commentary 
was deceiving.

> Ah, so you hold the John Kerry chair in political humor for
> Fido? IOW, you forget, if a joke has to be explained it failed.

No, it failed because you were unaware that the French gave up so easily to 
the Germans during WWII.  I don't know were you went to elementary school, 
but damn, I learned that little simplified factoid in the 2nd grade Bob...

> I figure the Saudis are more likely to puff up the figures, to
> their advantage. The US census people are more likely to try to
> be accurate.

Sure -- bash the source to try and make your numbers look better... Another 
deceptive tactic in a discussion Bob.  Keep going.. Keep going...

> Perhaps when you become less arrogant on the subject we can
> converse more. Come off it, you deleted the entire beginning
> of my msg because you had no answer to it.

I deleted the beginning because it was you "preaching" -- and I'm not going 
to be a pulpit for you to stand on Bob.  I was interested in a discussion, 
but all you do is argue.  I've received several netmails from other folks 
you associate with in the political echos, and you have a reputation for 
being an argumentative arrogant ass wipe.

> No, I didn't misquote you, I didn't quote you other than the
> fido quotes, I interpreted what you said in a very
> straightforward way. And again, in your expansion on it you

No, you twisted my reply to suit your "argument" Bob.  This boils down to 
your deceptiveness.

The rest of your message continues to be a mess of twisted argument and it 
will serve absolutely no point to continue this discussion because -- as 
others have pointed out, you simply want an argument, a pulpit to preach 
from, because you are an arrogant "ass-wipe" -- (not my words -- this came 
from someone else although I tend to agree with them).  I've learned that 
you are a very unhonerable arrogant echo person, and I'd prefer to add you 
to my list of twits than have a conversation with you. Now quit picking my 
nose and go away.

Cheers!
Shannon 

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a
 * Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:275/311)