Text 42696, 40 rader
Skriven 2006-11-17 10:44:00 av WAYNE CHIRNSIDE (1:123/140)
Ärende: Re: Insults
===================
-=> MARK LEWIS wrote to ROSS CASSELL <=-

 ML> business and that the democratics are for the people... that statement
 ML> was directed at the teachings of the 60's, 70's and 80's that the
 ML> benefits that companies garnered by republican ideals and methods would
 ML> trickle down to their employees and thus the employees would be taken
 ML> care of by the companies... as such, the employees should vote
 ML> republican so as to not "bite the hand that feeds them"... sadly, it is
 ML> all a total crock...


I've always thought it _possible_ corporate and industrial interests would be
better served were the common people to have disposable income.
My thinking being that we'd all have the monies to purchase goods and services
thus allowing for corporate profits while assuring quality products as industry
sought the business of satisfied customers.
I call my radical idea capitalism.

The Republican business model has always struck me as fascist or if 
you like to put it another way like corporate communism.

Expanding on this somewhat imagine if you will ALL the disposable income were
in the
hands of just the richest two percent of Americans.
Does corporate business thrive under this circumstance?

Now let's try the reverse, ALL disposable is in the hands of 98 percent
of Americans.

Under which scenerio do you think business will best thrive and
prosper?

Opinions anyone?
Please be prepared to show your work in how you arrived at your conclusions.



... It is the best of all possible worlds - Dr. Pangloss
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.47
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)