Text 43662, 88 rader
Skriven 2006-12-04 13:09:00 av BOB KLAHN (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av SHANNON TALLEY
Ärende: Insults
===============
 ST> Bob,

>> BF> Can you verify that Shannon have been talikng to you about
>> BF> this?

>> I'm not sure what is going on with that. Haven't quite figured
>> it out. Not sure it's worth trying to.

 ST> He is simply asking if we talked (online or offline) about
 ST> this.   He is accusing me (and has since the very very
 ST> beginning of this thing) that I slandered the memory of
 ST> your dearly departed wife.  As we talked offline, you
 ST> indicated that I hadn't done any such thing, and I offered
 ST> you a sincere apology if you perceived if I had.  However,
 ST> you indicated to me that you didn't perceive that I had.

 As I said, to you and to him, I see you just expressed that you
 had not heard of it.

 OTOH, there has been enough of that garbage flying around as to
 confuse the whole issue. So it is understandable.

 ST> BJ continues to accuse me of slandering the memory of your
 ST> dearly departed wife over and over, and I've yet to say
 ST> anything but kind words about anyone's family (which in my
 ST> opinion is waaayyy off topic anyway).

 Kind words are not off topic, IMO. And I always felt we can
 converse from differing points of view without having to feel
 animosity toward each other. I find discussing our families in a
 friendly way part of the process of talking around the world.

 ST> He continues to propagate this falsehood, and I've told him
 ST> that if he recants his statements of slander and
 ST> apologizes, then I would remove his quote from my website.

 What quote. Why would you put a dispute from here on your
 website anyway?

 ST> However, he won't admit that he started this whole escapade
 ST> with his slanderous and completely false statements and
 ST> continues to insinuate that I've stated mean and horrible
 ST> things about your dearly departed wife.

 Again, I see it as so much flying as to be confusing. The only
 thing I find is that you didn't call him on it. However, I just
 rechecked and can't find where you actually said anything.

 ST> The ONLY thing I've stated in this echo is this (Quoted
 ST> from the original message)

 ST> ---------
 ST> I won't speculate how his first wife died, it's a horrible
 ST> thing to have to go through.  One of my very good friends
 ST> lost his wife this past week.  She had been sick for a very
 ST> long time, and although it's really difficult for him, I
 ST> can't help but wonder if there is some feeling of relief.
 ST> What guilt one must endure over feelings like that.

 ST> Well, I hope he is happy with his (newer) 2nd wife.  Family
 ST> can be a good thing....  Although I despise him in the
 ST> echos, I wish him good faith and fortune in the RW.
 ST> ----------

 ST> Since this was posted, you and I had a very pleasant
 ST> conversation via Email where I offered my condolences and
 ST> we seemed to forge a friendly repartee.

 Yep.

 ST> I would ask you as a gentleman to please refer the
 ST> offending message to Bjorn or set him straight regarding
 ST> this matter once and for all.  I'd like to settle this so
 ST> that we can get on with more pressing issues other than his
 ST> continued slander and harassing statements.

 I have espressed this in email. However, he seems to be
 referring to something else, which I am not sure of. Like I
 said, there was a lot of it flying around.



BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... When you taser yourself there is no such thing as a one second burst.
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)