Text 43759, 72 rader
Skriven 2006-12-06 20:57:29 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 43754 av shannon talley (1:275/311)
Ärende: Insults
===============

 st> You continue to accuse me slandering Bob's dearly departed wife, yet
 st> everyone knows I never stated anything negative at all.

You still haven't fiured out what this is all about, have you?


>> The only thing I want is that he either put his name under his statement or
>> remove it, simple as that and not make my claim about him hiding behind his
>> God to justify his means come true, which he btw. already have. I don't even
>> ask for an apology which he does from me and that I have explained
>> to him but if it isn't done his way it's never gonna happend and I find that
>> a
>> bit
>> strange. Either he accept it or I will post that statement that I'm working
>> on
>> and that will put him in such bad light that he will never dream of so now,
>> once
>> again it's up to him to decide how he wants it.

 st> Sorry -- but I don't take kindly to threats.... You continue to accused me
 st> of slandering Bob's dearly departed wife, yet I haven't don't it.  Either
 st> prove I stated something terrible about his dearly departed wife or
 st> apologize (publically or privately -- it doesn't matter) and I'll remove
 st> the quote.

You still haven't figured out what this is all about, have you?
You accuse me of slandering you and then you do EXACTLY the same
yourself just out of pure revenge and retaliation on an anonomyous coward
website without even puting your name under it.
THAT shows what kind of peron you are and that you don't live the way you
preach but I don't expect you to understand that.

 st> EVEN BOB has indicated that I hadn't said anything!

 st> **Any offensive action taken by you will result in a greater quantity of
 st> offensive action taken by me.

See what I mean. It's all about retaliation, how adult.

 st> Now -- you started this thing Bj"rn, you can end it by simply recanting
 st> your statement and admitting your error.  Are you too proud to admit you
 st> made a mistake?  Humility is an important trait in a man Bj"rn.  If you
 st> have any,

*I* started it? It started by Ross's statement about Bob's wife and that you
took part of it and have you not got involved in it from the beginning this
would
never had happend and then YOU deliberatly blew it up by publishing it with
a most personal statement on your anonomously cowardly website without
putting your name under it.

 st> you'd admit your error (publicly or privately) and I'll remove the quote
 st> --
 st> that's it....  Simple... No notification or anything, it'll just 'be
 st> gone'. I'll be away this weekend (again) so act before Friday so I can do
 st> it.

 st> Perhaps you just read Ross' statement and thought it was mine.  I honestly
 st> believe that's what you did.  You don't like me 'anyway' -- so you just
 st> started the bandwagon and put it in high gear without realizing that it
 st> was someone else who posted that message you think I did.

OK, then I have to continue with my statement that proves you are wrong.

 st> Like you, I hate having my name slandered.....  So stop doing it, admit
 st> your mistake (publicly or privately) and move on.

We'll see what you have to say when I've finished my statement then.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)