Text 43912, 198 rader
Skriven 2006-12-11 10:19:57 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 43903 av shannon talley (1:275/311)
Ärende: The Truth   part 1 of 2.
================================
 st> You seem be taking several steps back from your original slander
 st> indicating that I had made horrible statements about Bob's deceased wife.
 st> I really don't see how your comment propagates your argument.  It also
 st> appears that "you" are the "ONLY" one who read messages indicating that I
 st> had made some horrible statement.  I've asked you several times to produce
 st> those messages, and you haven't.  So, please either apologize for making a
 st> very loud and extremely false accusation or simply admit your error so we
 st> can move on.

I've now gone through all posts that I have in my computer about this and I
haven't
found where I've done that, only accused you of participate in it.


This is how it all started.

RC Did you know that Klahn had his wife put to death?

 st>> I've heard some stories, but I've never seen any hard facts on the
 st>> matter. Of course, now I know not to believe whatever he posts......<g>

 RC You should see what he has for a wife now, she better watch her back too.

 st Do you have a link to any pictures?

  Shannon

And you say that you never participated in any diskussion about Bobs wife.
Why didn't you take distance from Ross's statement in the first place?
You saw an opportunity to smear an old "enemy"?

And then you started with:

 st>> Hello Mr. Bj"rn (Christian hater),

 st>> Since you hate Christians, there isn't much point in continuing.

BF And now is the time to go and hide behind your God.

 st>> See ??  As long as you continue to post dribble like that -- well then --
 st>> this echo will always remain the way it is.  We were having a fairly
 st>> quiet conversation until you decided to jump in and start lashing out at
 st>> people.

 BF> Yeah, a fairly quiet conversation about someone elses wife in a world wide
 BF> spread echo and if that's to be a true Christian I'm proud to be an
 BF> atheist.

 st> We mentioned her.  Nobody said anything bad about her Bj"rn.

 st>NOBODY SAID ANYTHING BAD ABOUT HER!!!!!!!!!??????????

 st>> Why did you do that?  Why do you continue to post inflammatory remarks?
 st>> "WE" -- people in this echo -- would really like to know.... There are 7
 st>> of us commenting your unprovoked remarks in Netmail and wondering what we
 st>> can do to get you to stop throwing fire crackers into this echo...

And how many times have I asked: Who are those 6 others? Why haven't more than
ONE (1) of those, Ross Cassell, said anything?
Tell me who they are or you are obviously lying and above you agreed to have
talked about someones wife.

And then you asked me some questions......

 st>> It's obvious you hate Christians - and as one who hates Christians we
 st>> have to believe that you hate religion.  Are you a descendent of the
 st>> third Reich? Are you communist?  What are you exactly that makes you hate
 st>> Christians?

......that I answered in the now famous way.

 BF> I hate every, Jew, Muslim, Christian or wharever that uses his God to hide
 BF> behind to justify their own means.
 BF> A true Christian doesn't behave like you just lika a true Muslem isn't a
 BF> terrorist. When it all turns into fanatism at least I react to it and by
 BF> that I condemn both you and the terrorists. You are all just as dangerous
 BF> to a democracy but neither of you realize this untill it's too late. You
 BF> never listen to anyone except your own and as soon anything doesn't go
 BF> your way you all can do whatever it takes in the name of your God. THAT'S
 BF> the people I hate and then I'm on a much higher moral ground than you ever
 BF> will be because......I haven't a God to hide behind.

And then you escalate it by puting this statement on your COWARD website and
prove all of what it contains by taking words out of context and make an own
statement that you don't even dare to put your name under and that is so coward
so I don't even have words for it without swearing.
And then you advertise it like:

 st> The Fidonews Website has been updated appropriately:
 st> http://www.fidotel.org

THE FIDONEWS WEBSITE......?????? It's YOUR site that has nothing to do with
Fidonews.

To Herman you wrote:

st> I didn't write it... BF did!  AND YOU KNOW THIS!  HE wrote those horrible
 st> words, all I did was quote it.

Just WHAT in my statement is so horrible? That I hate fanatic Christians or
fanatic Muslims? Isn't that what your war on terrorism is all about, fighting
fanatic
Muslems?

 st> What I did was honorable.  I let the world know what kind of person he is
 st> by simply quoting his statement.

By SIMPLY quoting my statement? If that was the only thing you had done this
hadn't exploded in your face. You did an own peronal remark with words taken
out of context and you didn't even dare to put your name under them and by
that you proved that religious fanatics hides behind something to justify their
own means.


 st>> Since you hate Christians, there isn't much point in continuing.

 BF> Well, now it's up to you to prove where I stated that. What I have said is
 BF> that I hate christians, muslems, jews or whatever that hides behind their
 BF> God to justify their own means.
 BF> How you can twist this into something else shows what kind of screwed up
 BF> mind you have.

You still haven't proved where I said that I hate Christians.



>>> BTW: I did try, as wel I try to understand you. And I think I do understand
>>> what Bj"rn Forsstr"m is saying.

 st>> I did.  He wrote, "I hate every, Jew, Muslim, Christian or wharever that
 st>> uses his God to hide behind to justify their own means."

 BF> That's right and how you then can interpret that to I hate every religion
 BF> beats me. ONLY THOSE WHO HIDE BEHIND IT TO JUSTIFY THEIR OWN MEANS. What
 BF> in that part don't you understand? Tell me so I can explain it to you.

 BF> Will you publish that on your webpage?

You still haven't asked me to explain this and I can understand why you
haven't.


>>> Think realistic Shannon. You have seen more of the world and more other
>>> cultures. Didn't you?

 st>> Yes, perhaps that's why I'm more tolerant that most folks.

Who are you more tolerant than? Herman?



->>> And how do you interpret my explanation above?

 st>> I won't try.  You wrote what you wrote.

 BF> That's what I call to have an open mind.

->>> Will you publish that on your webpage?

 st>> I quoted the whole paragraph, not just one part.  Then I also provided a
 st>> reference to the specific post at the bottom so everyone can read the
 st>> ENTIRE post and make up their own mind.

 BF> And then you couldn't resist making a personal comment below that throws
 BF> all the above in the sink. How noble.

->>> <Sigh> You will never get that, will you?

 st>> How could I ?

 BF> With that narrow mind of yours, yeah, how could you.

Above you said that you are more tolerant than most folks. Why doesn't that
show here or was it a lie?


>> Good, then you must have read what I have said so now it's up to YOU to
>> stand for what you say on your website.

 st> You wrote it -- it's time for YOU to stand up for what you wrote.  Alas,
 st> you won't...

A very strange statement of you. The only one that have stand by his words is
*ME* because I still don't see YOUR name under YOUR statement on YOUR coward
website.
Strange, very strange.

->> Yes it will but now I'm going down to Germay for a couple of days and will
->> be back until thuesday so you have to be patient.

 st> Enjoy your holiday.

It didn't happend but I'll make it up to me in Jan. when we go to Thailand for
two
months.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)