Text 43914, 183 rader
Skriven 2006-12-11 06:20:36 av shannon talley (1:275/311)
     Kommentar till en text av Björn Forsström
Ärende: Re: The Truth   part 1 of 2.
====================================
Bj"rn,

> st> indicating that I had made horrible statements about Bob's deceased 
> wife.
> st> I really don't see how your comment propagates your argument.  It also
> st> appears that "you" are the "ONLY" one who read messages indicating 
> that I
> st> had made some horrible statement.  I've asked you several times to 
> produce
> st> those messages, and you haven't.  So, please either apologize for 
> making a
> st> very loud and extremely false accusation or simply admit your error so 
> we
> st> can move on.
BF> I've now gone through all posts that I have in my computer about this 
and I
BF> haven't
BF> found where I've done that, only accused you of participate in it.

Let me remind you.

November 19th:
------
 st> You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about...  You're just
 st> rambling.  Are you and Bob lovers or something?

I wondered when that sick question should pop un in your sick head.

 st> Not that there is anything
 st> wrong with that, just trying to gauge why you are protecting him.

Protecting....hmmmm....Strange you find it OK to talk shit about a wife to a
person that can't defend herself.
Would you like if we talked shit about your ilegitimate children or your 
dead
or divorced whore?
------------

There are litterally about a dozen other messages where you claim that I 
said something bad about his deceased wife Bj"rn.

---------
> RC Did you know that Klahn had his wife put to death?
>
> st>> I've heard some stories, but I've never seen any hard facts on the
> st>> matter. Of course, now I know not to believe whatever he 
> posts......<g>
>
> RC You should see what he has for a wife now, she better watch her back 
> too.
>
> st Do you have a link to any pictures?
--------
WHERE in that statment you posted do I state something "bad" about her?  You 
PROVED my point in your post Bj"rn.  Now if you admit your mistake (are you 
man enough?) then I'll remove that quote from my website.

> And you say that you never participated in any diskussion about Bobs wife.
> Why didn't you take distance from Ross's statement in the first place?
> You saw an opportunity to smear an old "enemy"?

I saw that Ross & Bob had issues from another echo, and I "DID" distance 
myself from his statement in as much as I wanted to leave them alone.  I did 
so by my statement indicating that I had a friend who recently lost his wife 
and I empathized with Bob's plight.

THis statment, "Hello Mr. Bj"rn (Christian hater)" was made during a 
different conversation between you and me.

> And how many times have I asked: Who are those 6 others? Why haven't more 
> than
> ONE (1) of those, Ross Cassell, said anything?

Because it's really none of your business.

> Tell me who they are or you are obviously lying and above you agreed to 
> have talked about someones wife.

??  That didn't make sense... ??

> st>> It's obvious you hate Christians - and as one who hates Christians we
> st>> have to believe that you hate religion.  Are you a descendent of the
> st>> third Reich? Are you communist?  What are you exactly that makes you 
> hate
> st>> Christians?
> .....that I answered in the now famous way.
> BF> I hate every, Jew, Muslim, Christian or wharever that uses his God to 
> hide
> BF> behind to justify their own means.
> BF> A true Christian doesn't behave like you just lika a true Muslem isn't 
> a
> BF> terrorist. When it all turns into fanatism at least I react to it and 
> by
> BF> that I condemn both you and the terrorists. You are all just as 
> dangerous
> BF> to a democracy but neither of you realize this untill it's too late. 
> You
> BF> never listen to anyone except your own and as soon anything doesn't go
> BF> your way you all can do whatever it takes in the name of your God. 
> THAT'S
> BF> the people I hate and then I'm on a much higher moral ground than you 
> ever
> BF> will be because......I haven't a God to hide behind.

> And then you escalate it by puting this statement on your COWARD website 
> and
> prove all of what it contains by taking words out of context and make an 
> own

Your continued alligation of calling me a coward is a simple way of you 
lashing out because you don't like the fact your statement is on my website. 
We ALL realize this and to be honest, every time you do it I chuckle just a 
little more.

> statement that you don't even dare to put your name under and that is so 
> coward
> so I don't even have words for it without swearing.
> And then you advertise it like:
> st> The Fidonews Website has been updated appropriately:
> st> http://www.fidotel.org
> THE FIDONEWS WEBSITE......?????? It's YOUR site that has nothing to do 
> with
> Fidonews.

Really?  Hmmm... I wonder why the entire Fidonews archive is posted there 
then...  Strange coincidence isn't it?

> st> I didn't write it... BF did!  AND YOU KNOW THIS!  HE wrote those 
> horrible
> st> words, all I did was quote it.
> Just WHAT in my statement is so horrible? That I hate fanatic Christians 
> or
> fanatic Muslims? Isn't that what your war on terrorism is all about, 
> fighting
> fanatic
> Muslems?
> st> What I did was honorable.  I let the world know what kind of person he 
> is
> st> by simply quoting his statement.
> By SIMPLY quoting my statement? If that was the only thing you had done 
> this
> hadn't exploded in your face. You did an own peronal remark with words 
> taken
> out of context and you didn't even dare to put your name under them and by
> that you proved that religious fanatics hides behind something to justify 
> their
> own means.

Your quote, your explosion <grin>

> st>> Since you hate Christians, there isn't much point in continuing.
> BF> Well, now it's up to you to prove where I stated that. What I have 
> said is
> BF> that I hate christians, muslems, jews or whatever that hides behind 
> their
> BF> God to justify their own means.
> BF> How you can twist this into something else shows what kind of screwed 
> up
> BF> mind you have.

You started this slander campaign Bjorn.  If you want to end it, simply 
admit you made a mistake and all will be erased.  It's that simple.  Until 
you do, then I'll keep that statement up on the website until such time as 
something else trumps it.

> ->> Yes it will but now I'm going down to Germay for a couple of days and 
> will
> ->> be back until thuesday so you have to be patient.
> st> Enjoy your holiday.
> It didn't happend but I'll make it up to me in Jan. when we go to Thailand 
> for
> two
> months.

Thailand is a beautiful place.  A friend went there last month and he said 
the reconstruction had really really gone a long way.  It's just about back 
to "better" than it was before (from a tourist point of view that is).

Cheers!
Shannon 

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a
 * Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:275/311)