Text 44128, 87 rader
Skriven 2006-12-16 15:23:30 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
  Kommentar till text 44102 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Insults
===============
16 Dec 06 05:31, Björn Forsström wrote to Roy Witt:


 MvdV>>>> If Björn says he did not say that he
 MvdV>>>> hates all Christians, that settles it and  everyone who claims
 MvdV>>>> he says otherwise makes a fool of himself

 DS>>>    Depends(tm).

 RW>>>> No, Bjorn's made a fool out of himself. He said it, but maybe he
 RW>>>> didn't really mean to say it in such a way that made him look like
 RW>>>> an anti-religious zealot.

 DS>>>   Björn said what he said, and as he has so often explained
 DS>>> afterwards,
 DS>>>   the words said what he meant them to say

 RW>> But did he really know what the words meant? He may say that he said
 RW>> what he meant, but then we can't trust him to know the words that he
 RW>> used were actually what he meant to say.

 BF> If you are that fucking stupid so you don't understand after that I
 BF> have explained it so many times,

How do we know your explanation is what you really meant? You may say one
thing, but mean another for all I know. Your English is as bad as I've
ever seen in Fidonet.

 BF> why do you bother? It's only you and Shannon that sees it that way so
 BF> you must both be so fanatic

The only fanatic I see around here is you.

 BF>  that you don't understand what anyone else says to you or do you say
 BF> like Shannon that you are more tolerant than most?

I'm tolerant of those who know what they're talking about. So far, you've
never made any sense in what you write.

 DS>>>  -- and not what Shannon wrongly interpreted them to say.

 RW>> He wasn't far off.

 BF> Even here you and Shannon are the only one to believe so.

I probably have a better grasp of the English language than anyone here.

 DS>>>   He said it exactly like he meant it -- to make him look like an
 DS>>>   one who was against religious zealots.  That does not make him
 DS>>>   anti-religious, it makes him anti-zealot.

 RW>> I don't think so.

 BF> Who the fuck cares what you THINK.

Apparently that little weasel in Sveden named Bjorn.

 BF> Haven't you learned from Shannon that you must prove everything.

Why would Shannon have to teach me anything? I've got way more life
experience than he does.

 RW>>>> If so, then he should apologize for his inept use of the language
 RW>>>> and take what he said back.

 DS>>>    His use of the language was not inept -- it was accurate, as has
 DS>>> been
 DS>>>    explained by a number of people.

 RW>> The words may have been accurate in the structure of what he wrote,
 RW>> but he is the only one who knows what he meant. If those words were
 RW>> said to him, and with no coaching from the peanut gallery, how would
 RW>> he interpret them?

 BF> Why do you ask Dale that? Do you think he knows the answer?

Because he thinks you know what you're talking about. I say that you
don't have a clue and unless someone can interpret from Svedish to
English, no English speaking person ever will.

               R\%/itt




--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)