Text 44608, 86 rader
Skriven 2006-12-23 17:31:13 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 44580 av shannon talley (1:275/311)
Ärende: Does Bj"rn hate Christians or not?
==========================================
>> st> st> When I post something Christian, I get blasted away.  When Herman
posts
>> st> it, then "it's ok"....  Double standard?
>> You started it (again) with that silly remark.

 st> Silly?  It was a question.  There appears to be a double standard... If
 st> someone in Zone2 posts a something Christian related, there appears to be
 st> no retaliation by those without religion, but if someone here posts
 st> something Christian, there is retaliation.  Is there or Isn't there a
 st> double standard for the writer?

Quote
  st> I sincerely appreciate the sentiment Herman.  Thank you.
  st> Be advised that we have atheists in this echo who always take
  st> offense to Christian related posts.  However, they may make an
  st> exception for you because are in their zone.
End quote.

Where in the fucking hell is your question? Where is your question mark?
Don't fucking come here and talk about double standards or are you so fucking
dense that you don't even know what you're saying from one day to another?
It's things like this that pisses me off. You made a very plump and stupid
remark
and then you try to hind behind something and put the blaim on someone else.
Stand for what you say and do and don't be such a coward!!!!!!!


>>>> Should I respond: You fucking fanatic Christians celebrate the birth of
>>>> the
>>>> idiot you
>>>> hide behind. Fair enough?
>> st> I thought you didn't hate Christians........
>> If you can do silly remarks, why can't I?
>> And I thought you didn't hate atheists.........

 st> I didn't post anything hateful about Atheists Bj"rn, I'm very simply
 st> asking a question without any ill feelings or intentions.

See the quote above and tell me where that question is.
You took a chance and tossed shit and now you are paying for it.

 st> However, you posted something EXTREMELY hateful and NOW I'm asking you to
 st> quantify your statement.
 st> -----
BF:>> Should I respond: You fucking fanatic Christians celebrate the birth of
 st> the idiot you hide behind. Fair enough?
 st> -----

Apart from you I asked you a question if I could respond to your silly remark
in the
way I did and you took that as a statement. Your mistake, not mine.
Doesn't this prove that you read everything in a very strange way and interpret
it
in a way that suit your agenda?

 st> WHY did you post this extremely ANTI-Christian statement?  What purpose
 st> did it serve?  By all appearances it does provide the reader with the
 st> perception that you HATE Christians....  You've stated you don't hate
 st> Christians but you post this.... So why?

You really are dense, aren't you?

>> st> Should this be added to the Quote Wall ??
>> It's up to you and knowing you have a comprehension problem I wouldn't be
>> surprised.
>> Why is it so fucking difficult to talk to you without being misunderstood?
>> Do
>> you
>> sit and deliberate misread everything posted to you? And when it suits you,
>> you
>> threaten with your website again!!!!!
>> I suggest you use Roys mirror and drop that paranoid thinking.

 st> I'm giving you an opportunity to quantify your hateful statement; I
 st> suggest you word your reply carefully so that you can't be misunderstood.

IT WASN'T A FUCKIN STATEMENT STUPID, it was a ***QUESTION*** or don't
 you see the ? I wrote.

This is just what I mean when I'm saying that you deliberate misread everything
so it suits your own agenda so why the hell should I even try to communicate
with
you?

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)