Text 49676, 85 rader
Skriven 2007-04-19 16:08:11 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
  Kommentar till text 49630 av Joe Bruchis (1:3828/12)
Ärende: Bj"rn is a fool, was: Four fools?
=========================================
18 Apr 07 17:24, Joe Bruchis wrote to Roy Witt:


 RW>> 21 Jan 07 11:24, Joe Bruchis wrote to Joe Delahaye:


 RW>JB>> How can you tell if FOX is correct?  Everytime one of their hosts
 RW>> has
 RW>JB>> a guest on, they scream over them so the guests can't be heard.

 RW>> You should have been watching when Malik Shabazz of the 'New' Black
 RW>> Panthers was on the O'Reilly show.

 RW>> O'Reilly was on assignment in Iraq and a sweet oriental gal,
 RW>> Michelle Malkin, was hosting the show. Shabazz is the chairman (or
 RW>> whatever they call the head nigger in the outfit) and he treated
 RW>> Michelle like she was trash.

 RW>> He actually had the gall to call her a 'ho' on the show and acted
 RW>> like the prime example of all the blacks considered to be 'niggers'
 RW>> - plus he just wouldn't stop talking.

 JB> Haha!  No that was probably entertaining!

It was irritating as hell...I hate it when it's someone else's turn to
talk and some jackass just keeps on jabbering without saying anything
intelligent.

 RW>> This rude person was invited on the show to share his point of view,
 RW>> but he wasn't supposed to open his mouth and talk for the entire
 RW>> session. It was supposed to be a conversation, not a discertation.

 RW>> There are a few of the leftwing that actually can carry on a
 RW>> conversation,
 RW>> answer questions and sound intelligent, but not very many.

 JB> I go along with that for all "wings".

It's usually a one-sided conversation, if we listen to what's being said.

 RW>JB>>   Now that's fair? Balanced?

 RW>> The above was not fair and it certainly wasn't balanced, it was
 RW>> typically leftist whacko bullshit.

 JB> Yeah man.  I went from Republican to Constitutionalist.

Yeah.

 JB> However, in the 2004 debates, Bush refused to let any small parties
 JB> into the debate.

Non-represented parties. i.e. there's no sense in letting someone into a
debate of that nature, just to let them carry on.

 JB> Now, if it's a legit debate between parties,

The one in question was.

 JB> and all are nationally recognized parties registered with the Gov't,
 JB> how can all parties not be allowed to share their viepoints?

Not all parties have national recognition, nor representation...

 JB> Answer: Because the contitution is made out of GD parchment. ;)

That's true...but the words written on the parchment are made out of GD
ink. It's only when that parchment with the words indicating freedom's
ideals are read, does it actually represent something.

 RW>> The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant,
 RW>> but that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan

 JB> Ater stating that piece of philosophy,

 JB> Reagan got on his horse and said "Ah,hahaha!" and rode into the
 JB> sunset.- Jackie Mason

Whereupon, he lassoed Jackie Mason and Mason brayed like a jackass.


                R\%/itt

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)