Text 10086, 68 rader
Skriven 2008-01-19 09:54:44 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
  Kommentar till text 10006 av Ward Dossche (2:292/854)
Ärende: Holloway
================
18 Jan 08 07:06, Ward Dossche wrote to Roy Witt:


 RW>WD>> Well done I would say. The man's arrogance was an open invitation
 RW>WD>> for reaction.

 RW>> He's a typical Dutchman then, that Peter de Vries...

 WD> I wouldn't know what a typical Dutchman is, but I would consider him
 WD> annoying.

Well, unbeknownst to you, you have described a typical dutchman.

 WD> He's a major pain in the ass and I think his main drive for
 WD> pursueing the issue is publicity for the documentary he's making.

aka - Typical dutchman.

 WD> He was very intrusive as that type of journalists need to be.

What he found in vandersloot's words were inconsistancies. vdsloot refused
to clarify them.

 WD> Compare it to Michael Moore visiting Charlton Heston in "Bowling for
 WD> Columbine". In the end the journalist always wins and the interviewee
 WD> needs to pull-out or call the police with the camera going ...
 WD> extreme good footage but adds nothing to the matter.

In Moore's case, he produces cut and paste journalism. Nothing in his
documentries should be believed, until you do your own research. Moore is
the epitomy of a liar.

 RW>> Apparently VanderSloot thought it was appropriate at the time, but
 RW>> he went over and apoligized to the reporter afterwards.

 WD> At the end of the official (Dutch) interview Vandersloot asked "Will
 WD> you ever appologise should it be proven I was not-guilty?".

And, as a reporter, there is no need to 'apologize' for reporting the
news, even if it's misleading to the public.

 WD> De Vries responded by "What do you think?"

Which meant that there is no need for it.

 WD> Vandersloot "I don't think you're man enough to do that".

aka; There's no need to stoop to vandersloot's level.

 WD> Then the programme concluded. De Vries mubbled something but the mike
 WD> was shut where-upon Vandersloot threw him the glas of wine in the
 WD> face. So there must have been some provocation ...

If this is what vandersloot does in public, imagine what he is capable of
when there is no one to record the event! I'm sure that Natalie found out
too soon when she turned him down for sex.

 WD> Excellent footage again for the documentary ... news is business, you
 WD> know.

That's what OJ thought. He's still paying for that mistake.

                R\%/itt



--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)