Text 18289, 124 rader
Skriven 2008-06-27 08:33:31 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 18230 av Ross Cassell (1:123/456)
Ärende: Big Brother, I love you!
================================
 RC>>> I dont agree with everything they do..

 BF>> You're very silent with what you disagree with.

 RC> Up til now, you were very silent on what your govt does, your point?

As if you would be interested in what's going on in a little piss-ant country
like Sweden.

 RC>>> It doesnt take much to get you to perceive an ounce is a gallon does it?

 BF>> Depends on the one who's doing the pouring.

 RC> Perhaps you ought to lay off the booze?

Stop keep pouring then.

 RC>>> Nor am I fool enough to think that my idealogy be guided by people such
 RC>>> as you.

 BF>> But we should be guided by people like you?

 RC> Nope. But you are the one whom seems to infer I should have your views and
 RC> vote accordingly.

I've told you before, I'm not the one that have had a website only for smearing
those who doesn't agree with me.

 RC>>> I doubt the US holds sway over those parliamentarians that voted for it.

 BF>> I'm not as sure as you are. They know that it's good to stand on a good
 BF>> foot with their Big Brother and it was the right-wingers that voted for
 BF>> it.

 RC>>> Aside from that, if indeed your unfounded theory held any water, it
 RC>>> would have been all over the press.

 BF>> Everyone here kows where their symphaties lies. No secret about that.

 RC> Then prove your theory or can you?

I believe Felten did that....

 RC>>> Why would I want a Ward Healer whose youth and inexperience will betray
 RC>>> him as equally well as Jimmy Carter's indecisiveness betrayed him?

 BF>> See....you are a Bushbot.

 RC> How does that make me a Bushbot?

What you're reffering to is Bush's politics.

 RC> I know several Democrats whom would rather see someone other than Obama.

And then they will vote for McCain instead...?

 RC>>>>> p.s. I didnt vote for McCain in the SC primary held back in January.
 BF>>>> I don't think you voted for Obama or Hillary either.
 RC>>> Dont be silly, I couldnt have voted for them, they were in another
 RC>>> primary.
 RC>>> If you understand our system so well, you'd know why.

 BF>> I have never claimed that and when not even every American understand
 BF>> your system, why should I?

 RC> Then you should craft your commentary better.

But you did vote for a Republican.

 RC>>> Being as it may, then perhaps you ought to shut your yap having made
 RC>>> such an admission.

 BF>> What happend to The Free Speach that you Americans worship so. Does that
 BF>> only applies when it suits YOU?

 RC> It seems that you think that only you have rights, as you seem to have
 RC> extreme discomfort with my right to have my own ideas and beliefs.

It's just that you seem to turn the coat after the wind.

 RC> You are the one whom strives to try to make people believe as you do.

Nope, I just trying to make you see that there are other alternatives.

 RC>>> Not that I am required to share with you correspondence I have had with
 RC>>> my legislators, but they dont use Fidonet, therefore....

 BF>> Why do you then here say that you have said so much negative without
 BF>> proving it?

 RC> Because I dont have to prove it to you.

Then you can say anything that suits you and still you demand from me to
prove *my* theories.....

 RC> Freedom, rights, that sort of thing.

Sure....when it suits you...

 RC>>> So if I aint singing your chorus against Bush, I must be a Bushbot, isnt
 RC>>> that like if I aint with you I must be against you?

 BF>> That's the Bush ideology.....

 RC> Evidentily it is yours as well.

Then we are two of a kind.

 RC>>> So when you run out of arguments to make, you bring in strawmen to
 RC>>> divert?

 BF>> As I said, that wasn't to you so I don't understand why you're making
 BF>> such a big fuss about it.

 RC> When you people start projecting or injecting nonsensical points into a
 RC> topic those points arent related to???????

And you have never done that....and I don't recall that I heve ever forced you
to respond to me...instead you have in the past choosen to ignore posts from
me but now it seems to suit you because you have someting to bicker about.
I don't think I will ever understand how you think.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)