Text 25944, 87 rader
Skriven 2009-01-11 10:07:01 av Joe Bruchis (1:3828/12.0)
  Kommentar till text 25943 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: Pump prices down
========================
Michiel van der Vlist wrote in a message to Joe Bruchis:

 MvdV> Hello Joe,

 MvdV> I am sorry if I missed that.

No problem.

 JB> You coninuaully tell me, over almost two years now, I want to keep
 JB> burning fossil fuels. Yes, I do.  It's not hurting a thing, and
 JB> besides what some scientists say, it is renewable.

 MvdV> Sure. all we have to do is catch all the CO2 we have burned, turn
 MvdV> it into coal and oil again and put it back into the gorund. Or we
 MvdV> just wait another 5 billion years and nature will undo wnat we
 MvdV> did in a hundred years.

There is new evidence that shows oil in the ground really didn't come from
fossils. I haven't researched it in depth, but I think we would have used up
all the decaying and compressed dinosaurs long ago. In any event, there are
vast untapped oil fields in Russia and Alaska as well as many other places on
Earth, other than the middle east. That's without considering the oceans to
drill, where there are also vast untapped areas.

 MvdV> So to avoid paying taxes you stick your head in the sand and say
 MvdV> global warming becuase of CO2 emission is a haox....

No, it's not to avoid paying taxes. If the CO2 global warming theory is a hoax,
the tax on CO2 emmissions to cure global warming is a hoax. Also, if it's not a
hoax, it's just plain false.

 MvdV> Sorry if you find that offensive, but it is as I see it. You put
 MvdV> your head in the sand to protect your selfish interest.

If that's how you see it, "send me some money and I'll sell you a ski resort in
Florida". The difference is, laymen can see through that hoax.

 JB> Al Gore began this journey into a globalized attack on CO2 because he
 JB> knew common folk would find it too technical and just accept it as
 JB> truth.

 JB> Are you proving Al Gore to be right?

 MvdV> Al Gore was not the first to come up with the relation bewteen
 MvdV> CO2 emission and global warming. Already 30 years ago I was a
 MvdV> member of a group of scientists who concerned themselves with
 MvdV> these matters.

I should have known. (-: So what correlation do you see between CO2 emmisions
and global warming? I have already given my facts that there is no correlation.
Now show me there is a correlation.

 MvdV> And sorry if I did not read all of your story. Whan I was a
 MvdV> student, some 40+ years ago, I enjoyed arguing with people who
 MvdV> believed the earth is flat, people who believed they could make a
 MvdV> perpetuum mobile or people who thought Einstein was wrong and it
 MvdV> is possible to go faster than light.

Well there's serious scientists that believe time travel is possible. I'll let
you argue with them.  But man's contribution to CO2, a very good gas, is so
minute, it's ridiculous to think we can make a difference in significantly
reducing this GOOD GAS.

 MvdV> Now that I am older and my body keeps reminding me that life is
 MvdV> finite, I have lost interest. I do not want to spent any more
 MvdV> time on what I consider lost cases.

I don't consider it fun by any stretch. It's laborious to debate in writing.
You're correct, spending energy on one who has a strict mind set is a worthless
cause.

 MvdV> Add to that people claiming the sun is the cause and the sole
 MvdV> cause of global warming. Sorry Joe, it is a hoax, I have better
 MvdV> things to do than prove the earth is not flat.

If you can't see what (hopefully) the hottest body of mass and gas is near your
face, well maybe you would buy a ski resort in Florida. If that's "an earth is
flat" theory, then find the answer to the true cause of global warming. It's
not the CO2 produced by the single digit % of CO2 gas that all of man creates
in the atmosphere.  


Regards,

 Joe 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
 * Origin: D'Bridge 3.06 -=[Fire on the Bayou]=- (1:3828/12)