Text 34529, 65 rader
Skriven 2009-07-17 21:43:02 av Lee Lofaso (3:800/432.0)
  Kommentar till text 34515 av Mike Roberts (1:261/1381)
Ärende: Re: NASA Moon Landing Ho
================================
Hello Mike,

MR>There was a dvd out a few years back. I can't remember the name.
MR>But it was one which claimed that it was a hoax and there is a very
MR>simeple reason why it had to be. It was something about a commonly
MR>known (not to me I am not a science guy ) but there is a radiation
MR>belt around the earth, which would not allow for a man to survive
MR>passing through it to get to the moon.

Probably "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon."
An excellent dvd.  Basically what was said was that astronauts
would need a minimum of six feet of lead surrounding a spaceship
in order to fly through the Van Allen Belts between the Earth
and the Moon in order to get there.  Lead is heavy.  Very heavy.
So heavy a spaceship such as that could never be launched from Earth
into space.  Meaning it would an impossibility for man to fly to the
Moon and survive (the thickness of the Apollo spacecraft was that
of aluminum foil).  Unless he were to fly from either the North Pole
or the South Pole, going around the Van Allen Belts, to get to the
Moon.  However, that route would be too expensive, as it costs much
more in fuel to launch a spaceship from either pole than it would
to launch a spaceship closer to the equator.  And that was just
one of the reasons cited in the dvd as to why man never set foot
on the Moon.

MR>It's much more in depth than I could put it, but that was the
MR>jist of it. I thought it sounded a little hokey, but how could they fake
MR>that.

MR>Well now I am beginning to wonder. Who is the guy? Richard hoagland?

The Van Allen Belts were discovered before we put man in space.
Scientists knew what the effects of the Van Allen Belts would do
to astronauts if astronauts were to fly through the Van Allen
Belts.  Which is why we never landed a man on the Moon.

MR>I think at enterprise.com, that also claims this ans supposedly
MR>shows exactly how NASA faket the pictures. One that stands out is
MR>the astronaut standing on the moon with the Flag blowing straight
MR>out. He claims there is no wind on the moon, so How could the flag
MR>be totally out straight? 8-)  I dunno 8)

NASA claims the flag is rigid, not made of cloth or fabric,
but that it was waving after the astronauts planted it because
the Moon has earthquakes.  Or rather "moonquakes."

To learn more about NASA's Moon landing hoax, log on to this site -

http://www.moonmovie.com/

Several dvd's are available, along with lots of info and a message
board on the site.  Feel free to make up your own mind, based on the
evidence (or rather lack of it).

MR>... Remember:  'i' before 'e', except in Budweiser

So that's why the Brits finally ditched the rule.  :)

--Lee


 * SLMR 2.1a * Allons Bingo.

--- Maximus 3.01
 * Origin: Xaragmata / Adelaide SA telnet://xaragmata.thebbs.org (3:800/432)