Text 35008, 123 rader
Skriven 2009-08-16 13:12:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av WAYNE CHIRNSIDE
Ärende: affordable health care
==============================
On 08-16-09, WAYNE CHIRNSIDE said to TIM RICHARDSON:


TR> And here we have the end of all rational discussion on the subject, as
TR> when those who cannot come up with any reasoned thoughts, they
TR> immediately degenerate the conversation by bringing in `Nazis' and
TR> Hitler.


WC>*They*?




Yes *they*! As in you....Felten, and a few others.



WC>While I recognize the relevance of Mr. Felton's remark


*Relevance* to what? Turnip patches? Or fear mongering?


WC>*I* used the reference to The American Eugenics Society which preceeded
WC>Hitler's Germany and proposed the same sort of *fixing her* solution
WC>as you propose.


Not at all. That is dishonest on your part. I proposed no such thing.


TR> So, there is only one or two among this entire echo who can talk
TR> reasonably on the subject of abortion.


WC>Myself being one of the more than two.


Not even close. You came off on a level of stupidity to rival that of Ceppa,
known to be the stupidest person in Fido, bar none!


WC>I propose proper contraception techniques be used primarily but I
WC>object to your making the decisioins for half the population
WC>of the planet.


I made no such *decision* for half or even a `portion' of the planet. We were
having a discussion. I exprssed some thoughts on the subject of abortion. You
and your friends chose to bring in Nazis, snide references to Hitler, and all
manner of other inane BS. You put the conversation on the down-slope, and are
now running down hill with it for all you're worth.


WC>Noting you changing the subject line to I KNOW BEST a few posts further


I did no such thing. To my knowledge the `subject line' hasn't changed. I've
replied to posts addressed *to* me in this thread, without regard to what it
says in the *subject* line. If that got changed....either *you* or one of
your friends changed it for your own reasons. Attributing the changing of the
subject line to me is not just dishonest on your part, it clearly indicates
you don't really know what you're talking about in this thread.


Incidently, I went back a ways and noticed that the *subject* line was changed
in a post I recieved from Robert Bashe. Thats probably who altered it. Take it
up with him.



WC>one. BTW, neither contraceptive foam, prophilactics nor IUD's
WC>are 100 percent effective.


Nobody claimed they were. But using nothing is a *guaranteed* risk of
pregnancy.


TR> Drummond seems to be the only person capable of quiet, reasoned
TR> conversation here. Most of the rest follow the same pattern of
TR> stupidity and illogic that have become the benchmark of Ceppa and
TR> Chirnside.


WC>Uh David Drummond agreed with me tha contraception is the best
WC>solution preferable to abortion however I by my own example employed
WC>those methods to preclude the need for abortion in the first place.


WC>I did what I knew was right but unlike you I do not set myself
WC>up as the moral arbiter of the rest of the nation.


I have done no such thing.


WC>I believe in *freedom* of the individual as long as it neither
WC>endangers nor impinges upon *my* rights.


Too bad that didn't extend to the person who's door you kicked in, and who's
domicile you illegally forced your way into in the recent past. You're lucky
you didn't end up shot!


WC>Sure a prophilactic can fail but is it for you to decide the rest
WC>of that persons life be dictated by a manufacturing defect?


TR> Nice. End of conversation.


WC>I'd hate to see you in an uncivil conversation if you consider this
WC>attack being nice.


*I* was the one attacked. I have defended myself.

---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)