Text 35522, 214 rader
Skriven 2009-09-02 10:19:00 av john guillory (1:396/60)
  Kommentar till text 35294 av johng@communicomm.com (1:123/140)
Ärende: affordable health care
==============================
* Automaticly forward for WAYNE CHIRNSIDE

 > he dropped a moose with it.
 > Care to stand in front of that?
 > Same clause, no bullet just the standard powder load.

 > I don't know the powder load of a Brown Bess musket but 
 > that would likely be suicidal as well.

 > .357 pistols have killed with blanks as well.

 >  RW> Colloquially, the term "high caliber" is used to refer to people or
 >  RW> employees of great competence or ability, not firearms.

 > Thank you, but it applies to weapons as well.
 > See calibre refers to the bore of the firearm, the diameter of the
 > bullet, bore and muzzle.

 >  WC>> Would you care to stand 15 feet in front of a .50 calbre
 >  WC>> Grizz rifle firing a blank?

 >  RW>> Sure. Would you be willing to stand in back of me?

 >  WC>  To catch your corpse, sure.

 >  RW> I'm afraid that wouldn't be possible in your case.

 >  WC>  What are friends for?

 >  RW> To take the fired wad in the chest as I move out of the way.

 > Ah so you're backing off the idea blanks are safe, and Roy Boy, it ain't
 > just the _wad_ you keep talking about, it's the muzzle blast as well.

 > I was being sarcastic when suggesting I'd stand behind you as I'd not 
 > participate in such an obvious Darwin Award venture.
 > I guess the _what are friends for_ didn't evoke the intended sarcasm
 > to you as intended.

 > I'm not used to talking to people who are so dense as to argue for days
 > without end that blanks do not kill nor was Jon Erik Hexum
 > killed by a blank when in fact he was.

 >  WC>> If you do care to do so I'm certain many here will eulogise you.

 >  RW>> They needn't bother, I will survive that paper wad by using my super
 >  RW>> powers.

 > See, I said you were delusional.
 > BTW, stupidity is not generally considered to be a super power.

 >  WC> Uh huh, you might want to view images on the internet from .50
 >  WC> calibre long rifle blank weapons fire first.

 >  RW> Why should I bother with that when I can go to my gun cabinent and 
 > take
 >  RW> one out?

 > No there is a scary thought, you armed with anything more 
 > dangerous than a rubber band.
 > At least no risk to me being a eight hundred - a thousand miles
 > away from you.

 >  WC>  The blast at 15 feet holes two large phone books and sets them afire
 >  WC> as well. Real viewable pictures.

 >  RW> Bullshit.

 > Gazoontite.

 >  WC> .50 calibre rifle weapons fire is effective against light armor like
 >  WC> a Bradley fighting vehicle at 600 yards.

 >  RW> Not if it's shooting blanks, dickhead.

 > I didn't stipulate that airhead.
 > MK82A and .50 calibre Barret, both .50 calibre military sniper rifles.
 > But for around 2,000 dollars you can have you very own .50 calibre.

 > Or *build* it for 1/4 as much as my brother did.
 > He's a registered gun dealer and gunsmith in CO.

 >  WC>>> I said he died from a blank. Your reply, nope, then you go on to
 >  WC>>> say he did in fact die from that blank.

 >  RW>>> Now you've got it.

 >  RW>>> Brandon Lee was killed by a 'squib' load. A squib is a live round
 >  RW>>> of real ammo that has the powder removed from the shell and the
 >  RW>>> bullet reinserted. The primer in the shell is powerful enough to
 >  RW>>> propel a

 >  WC>> BS,  a squib is NOT s live round of ammo with the bullet and powder
 >  WC>> removed then bullet reinserted.

 >  RW>> LOL! You're stupider than I thought. This is priceless!

 >  RW> [that damned mirror again]

 >  WC> What's priceless is your advertizing your stupidity.
 >  WC> You're the only one here who believes your crap.

 >  RW> That may be true, but they're also the only ones who are as stupid as
 >  RW> you.

 > Yeah, that annoyingly low 137 I.Q.

 > In H.S. I tested in the top 2 percent.

 > More recenly in the TABE tests the top 5 percent, and no
 > I've no idea what the TABE acronym stands for however it
 > was a grueling 6 day, 8 hour a day test and I was one
 > of very few admitted to the Abilities of Florida computer
 > programming course.

 >  RW>> "A squib load, also known as a squib round, pop and no kick, or just
 >  RW>> a squib, is a firearms malfunction in which a fired projectile does
 >  RW>> not have enough force behind it to exit the barrel, and thus becomes
 >  RW>> stuck. This type of malfunction can be extremely dangerous, as
 >  RW>> failing to notice that the projectile has become stuck in the barrel
 >  RW>> may result in another round being fired directly into the obstructed
 >  RW>> barrel."

 >  WC> Yeah, your diversion in face of the fact your claims are false noted.

 >  RW> LOL! You're so adept at using Google, take the entire text from quote
 >  RW> to quote and you can find the same source, which isn't a bullshit
 >  RW> source like the one you're using.


 > Source I'm using is a television documentary on special effects
 > where they showed squibs being attached to stuntmen backed by a metal
 > plate, with blood capsule and electrically fired  by remote control.

 > Nothing to interpret, just factual information presented and 
 > demonstrated. 

 >  RW>> You can read all about if you really do Google it. I did, but you
 >  RW>> and Lofatso certainly did not.

 >  WC> I googled Hexum, not Brandon.

 >  RW> If I were you, I wouldn't depend on your stupid friends to give you
 >  RW> anything but the bullshit they create in their own heads.

 > I do not consider either you or Tim Richardson my friends, 
 > problem solved.

 >  WC>> A squib is not fired at the target but by remote control as it's
 >  WC>> already attached to the target with a backplate to protect the
 >  WC>> actor.

 >  RW>> LOL! Man, Ceppa should have some of the shit you're smokin'.

 >  WC> It's a movie special effects device.

 >  RW> That stuff was good for the sixties, but it certainly isn't doing you
 >  RW> any good.

 > I quit smoking in 1987.

 >  WC>> All a squib is is a _tiny_ powder charge meant to burst a blood
 >  WC>> capsule on the intended _victem_ giving the impression of
 >  WC>> a gunshot wound.

 >  RW>> LOL! I thought you had extensive use of Google and could find out
 >  RW>> for yourself that what you're saying here is absolute Bullshit. So
 >  RW>> much so that it's Priceless!

 >  WC> Hell, don't need google for that, it's been on T.V. special effects
 >  WC> documentaries.

 >  RW> LOL! Looney Tunes!

 >  WC>> A squib is a special effects device developed expressly for this
 >  WC>> purpose and has absolutely no relationship to projectile munitions.

 >  RW>> [Winchurnester, looking in his very own carnival mirror proclaims to
 >  RW>> his-self:]

 >  WC>> You appear to know absolutely nothing about firearms or the
 >  WC>> dangers they represent.

 >  RW>> You are a fucking idiot without your meds. In your present
 >  RW>> condition, you're not even allowed to 'see' a gun, let alone have
 >  RW>> one.

 > I can get my hands on guns any time  I want however what for?
 > I've never hunted.
 > I've no desire to kill anyone.
 > And I'm just plain bored with shooting paper targets.

 >  WC> You're the idiot that wants to stand in front of a .50 calibre Grizz
 >  WC> with a blank load in it and wants me to stand behind you.

 >  RW> That was your suggestion. I didn't take it as seriously as you. 
 > Anybody
 >  RW> who would stand in front of a firearm, is a nut case like you.

 > Reset your message pointers *you* said you'd stand in
 > front of one if I'd stand behind you.

 > I replied sarcastically, to catch your corpse?
 > Sure what are friends for.
 > Obvious sarcasm to all but an airhead.

 >  RW> [that damned mirror again]

 > Do you spend all day in front of it?

 >  WC> Somehow that seems to me it's you and not I that is off their meds,

--- FMail/Win32 1.60
 * Origin:  (1:396/60)