Text 4670, 93 rader
Skriven 2007-07-18 15:41:35 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
   Kommentar till text 4568 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Rules for FIDONEWS
==========================
17 Jul 07 08:57, Björn Forsström wrote to Roy Witt:


 RW>>>>>>>>>> I see. How many innocent women and children do you suppose
 RW>>>>>>>>>> Shannon
 RW>>>> has
 RW>>>>>>>>>> blown up with a car bomb?

 BF>>>>>>>>> How would I know

 BF> Do you see that I din't even use a period and to a normal person this
 BF> sentence would end with a ?

That would all depend on your version of normal. By normal, do you mean an
uneducated one like you who jumps to conclusions, or one like me who asks
for proper punctuation, before believing you?

 BF> but not to one whos only purpose is to stir things up.

So you admit that you omitted the ? to stir things up...

 RW>>>> This sure would be easier if you understood English. I asked you
 RW>>>> how
 RW>> many
 RW>>>> women and children he had killed. You said; "How would I know"
 RW>>>> (note:
 RW>> you
 RW>>>> left no question mark, no punctuation at all)...

 BF> And here you say that I didn't use any punctuation at all but in
 BF> another post you said that I had used a period.

Where is your proof of that?

 BF>>> I'm so damned sorry Mr. nitpicking spellingpolice and you with your
 BF>>> superintelligent brain couldn't understand that there were supposed
 BF>>> to be a ? there?

 RW>> How am I to know what you're saying without you using the proper
 RW>> punctuation to express it? Am I supposed to read your mind?

 BF> Instead of jumping to conclusions you could have asked but then it
 BF> wouldn't have been funny for you.

It wasn't then and it still isn't funny. I'm seriously considering the
thought that you're just here to stir shit and deliberately do this type
of thing to frustrate everyone who reads (attempts to read) you jibberish.

 BF>>> You could also have asked because I totally missed that. Be lucky
 BF>>> that I don't correct your typos.

 RW>> LOL! The ratio of mine vs yours would be more than you could handle.
 RW>> If I pointed out your errors, this echo would be nothing but
 RW>> correction messages about your use of the English language and it's
 RW>> spelling.

 BF> At least I'm trying and doing my best.

Hmmmm. What does your best say about you? Even the Felten took some advice
and doesn't use commas after every other word, anymore. Improvement in
your communications is much better than continuing to show your ignorance.

 RW>>>> The really sick part is that you don't understand English well
 RW>>>> enough to answer a question with a properly worded reply.

 BF>>> And you're supposed to know that too and can ask for an explanation
 BF>>> if there is something that's unclear but instead you chose to make
 BF>>> it to something that it isn't. Well, that's just you I guess.

 RW>> Actually, I've made it very clear that I don't understand what
 RW>> you're saying, but your explanations are just as bad as the
 RW>> original.

 BF> Maybe there is something wrong in the eyes of the reader.

So, you're not taking the blame for your own iniquities...

 RW>> Were I a mind reader, I'll bet that reading yours would still leave
 RW>> me confused.

 BF> It seems that you're the only one with that problem.

I'm the only one who's said anything, because I'm the one who can't
understand you, I guess. Maybe everyone else likes to read your jibberish.

                R\%/itt


"Beware the lollipop of mediocrity! Lick it once and you'll suck
forever..."

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)