Text 5267, 67 rader
Skriven 2007-08-03 17:03:45 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
   Kommentar till text 5069 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: R&R exchanging insults
==============================
01 Aug 07 19:51, Björn Forsström wrote to Roy Witt:


 BF>>>>> When you start acting half the man you claim to be I will respond
 BF>>>>> to you.

 RW>>>> When you're capable of understanding English, it's methods of
 RW>>>> punctuation and spelling, then you may respond with some semblance
 RW>>>> of intelligence.

 BF>>> At least I'm trying and can make myself understood in over 5
 BF>>> languages.

 RW>> Yes, you may be all of that, but I wonder; do you bitch at people
 RW>> who try to correct your errors, like you do here?

 BF> You don't try to correct them, you only jump to conclusions and make
 BF> fun of people who try their best.

Actually, I wade through your bad English without saying anything about
all of the errors that you make. There isn't time enough in one day for
that, not to mention I'm not the spelling police. You have that in the
Fidonews editor, who doesn't have a clue about how English works either.

 RW>>>> Without that knowledge, you're just another bumbling idiot without
 RW>>>> and education.

 BF>>> Without and education? What does that mean?

 RW>> Let's face it, without language skills, one cannot have a very good
 RW>> education. One needs communication skills to learn.

 BF> So you and I can talk to each other in Norwegian, Danish, Swedish,
 BF> German and a little in Finnish, Greek and Thai? Good.

I wouldn't bother. If you butcher those as bad as you do English, what's
the use?

 BF>>>>> Remember, not jumping to conclusion and me missing a ?.

 RW>>>> Yes, I do remember them, you do both quite often.

 BF>>> And.....?
 BF>>> You're the only one having a problem with it.

I guess I expect too much from somebody who claims to know English.

A sentence or statement ends with a period, which is what you put at the
end of the statement in question. Do I have to guess that there should be
a ? there?

 RW>> Actually, you were the one who brought up your errors in 'jumping to
 RW>> conclusion (sic)' and the ommission of proper punctuation marks.

 BF> Yeah, sure.

Thanks for admitting to it.


                R\%/itt


"Beware the lollipop of mediocrity! Lick it once and you'll suck
forever..."

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)