Text 5578, 148 rader
Skriven 2007-08-18 07:21:54 av shannon talley
     Kommentar till en text av Ross Cassell
Ärende: Re: Sad Day in Minneapolis
==================================
Ross,

That was really a waste of time because I'm not concerned with the "down" 
flag (as I've already stated).  I understand that issue -- and did 
immediately after Ward published "his" version of the nodelist.

Go back and read that message that Ward wrote where he quoted my nodelist 
segment, and compare our Z1 segment to his segment -- THEN come back and 
explain it.

> I suppose its easier to argue a conspiracy theory as opposed to 
> acknowledging a
> fact.

I'm not arguing a conspiracy Ross -- I even stated there must be a reason 
that other stuff is in /their/ nodelist -- but I really don't know why.

Shannon

> Hello shannon!
>
> 17 Aug 07 18:29, you wrote to Janis Kracht:
>
> >> What your RC sent is what goes out on Tuesday night to the other
> >> ZCs, Shannon. As a former RC, YOU should know that.  What YOU get on
> >> Thursday night is different. Now you are going to tell me you didn't
> >> know this?
>
> st> You still haven't addressed the issue with the nodelist tinkering...
>
> and you havent proved it.
>
> There is no nodelist tinkering..
>
> You *used* to be a RC, you should know how things work.
>
> As R18C I submit to the Z1C 2 segments a week.
>
> I send her a stub on Tuesday afternoons and thursday afternoons.
>
> What I send her on tuesdays will be included in what she and the other 
> ZC's
> exchange amongst each other. If I made any changes for that submission, it
> insures that change appears in every zones friday nodediff production.
>
> If I make a change after tuesdays submission but before thursdays 
> submission,
> then said change will reflect in Z1 nodediff production, but outside of 
> Zone
> One, that change will have to wait til the following week in order for 
> said
> change to reflect in their nodelist.
>
> Apparently *your* RC operates in the same fashion..
>
> What Janis said was that when your RC submitted you as marked down, he did 
> so
> on his tuesday submission, what this means is that this is what she sent 
> to the
> other ZC's.. *That* is the info that got included in the nodediff 
> production
> the other zones used, among the normal changes internal to those 
> respective
> zones!
>
> What Janis also said is that *your* RC also submitted to her another stub 
> on
> thursday that showed you not marked as down...
>
> *READ CAREFULLY*
>
> The revised info Janis received on thursday superseded info she had 
> received on
> thursday as far as Zone One nodediff production goes. BUT it did not 
> supersede
> info for nodediff production for the other zones, until the following 
> week..
>
> Thats why you werent being showed as down in the resulting Z1 nodelist, 
> but you
> were in the nodelists produced in the other zones.
>
> It is not nor never was nodelist tinkering, its called the latest 
> available
> info, which is governed by the timing and schedules of each ZC exchanging 
> stubs
> versus each RC submitting them to their ZC.
>
>
> Sun   Mon   Tue   Wed   Thu   Fri   Sat
>
>            AB            C   D
>
>
> A =
>
> RC13 submits a stub to Z1C, showing you as marked down
>
>
> B =
>
> Z1C generates a Z1 seg based on all available and current info and sends 
> it to
> other ZC's and collects their segs.
>
> C =
>
> RC13 submits another stub to Z1C, shows you *not* marked down.
>
> D =
>
> Z1C using segs collected from other ZC's and the most recent regional segs 
> (See
> Point C), generates a Zonal Seg and produces a nodediff. Information that 
> is in
> this seg that is different from what she sent in point B, is not in other 
> zones
> nodelist at this point, but will be transmitted the following tuesday.
>
> Does this help?
>
> Look, I dont want you getting irritated with me, perhaps you will, but 
> before
> you start demanding people to read what you write or to prove whether or 
> not
> you said something, it is also fair that you also read what other people 
> write.
>
> Janis painted a pretty darn clear picture for you, she showed you the
> differences between your RC's tuesday and thursday submits, you refused to 
> see
> it.
>
> I suppose its easier to argue a conspiracy theory as opposed to 
> acknowledging a
> fact.
>
> ==
> Ross
> Fidonet Feeds Or Fidonet In Your Newsreader: http://www.easternstar.info
> E-mail: ross(at)cassell(dot)us | Blogs/Other Places: 
> http://links.cassell.us
> .. WORK HARDER! Millions on welfare depend on it.
> --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-30413
> * Origin: The Eastern Star - Spartanburg, SC USA (1:123/456) 

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a
 * Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:275/311)