Text 8351, 59 rader
Skriven 2007-12-18 13:27:25 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
     Kommentar till en text av Ross Cassell (1:123/456)
Ärende: George W. Bush
======================
Hello Ross,

On Monday December 17 2007 20:03, you wrote to me:

 MV>> Once again you are selective in your indignation. You said nothing
 MV>> when Ross made some derogatory remarks about "Diana sacrificing her
 MV>> fucking life".

 RC> Thats because those comments werent deragotory,

Says who? *I* considered it derogatory.

 RC> they were emphasizing, but you practice selective comprehension, oh
 RC> wait, English isnt your first language, yet you use it better than I?

Ah yes, the universal excuse for saying anything you want...

 MV>> You said nothing when the same person made a very insulting
 MV>> remark about European countries being weak and easily concurred.
 MV>> And don't give me that "moderator should set the example" again.
 MV>> Ross also claims to be the moderaor here.

 RC> First off, Jeff has never concurred with any insult I hurled your way,
 RC> Jeff has also not been a regular in this echo for the entire time
 RC> period that I have hurled any insults your way.. (See I am being
 RC> honest?)

The same goes for any insults - percieverd or not - coming from Björn. jef has
been a regular for exactly the same time. Yet he responds to what comes from
Björn and not on what comes from you.

 RC> But if you want to play this game of semantics, you havent exactly
 RC> slapped anyone down over there for insults hurled this way, but the
 RC> reason is, you agreed with the insult or didnt consider it one or
 RC> perhaps didnt want to break ranks?

<shrug> I have become immune to your insults. When I enter here I done my
asbestos underware and mount my reinforced next key.

 RC> But the cite you use above isnt a insult, its the truth and this truth
 RC> is written in history, its "conquered" btw. If the opposite was true,
 RC> would Germany have taken you all over so easily?

That was over 60 years ago, I was not even born than. Yes, we wree outgunnedn
and outmanned. However we did not *stay* conquered. And you used the past
tense. let anyone try to conquer us now and see what happens...

 RC> Use another example, I have insulted you all for being third world
 RC> countries, lousy education systems, etc..

You are missing the point. The point was directed at Jeff: he is selective in
his indignation. he *only* responds to (perveived) insults coming from this
side. Especially coming from Björn.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20070503
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)