Text 11297, 79 rader
Skriven 2010-10-14 06:30:10 av Bob Ackley (1:300/3)
Ärende: Control of the Internet
===============================
I found this in another echo, and while it doesn't (directly) affect
those of us not located in the US it may be of some interest:
------------------------------------------------
from biggovernment.com

November 30th Could Be the Day the Government Seizes Control of the Internet
by Seton Motley
November 30th, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) could potentially
engage in one of the largest federal power grabs we have ever seen.

After two years of this Presidential Administration and this Congress, that is
saying an awful lot about an awful lot.
And what's worse, the FCC would be doing it without Congress weighing in.  At
the FCC's November meeting - note the coincidental date of choice, AFTER the
impending election - three unelected bureaucrats (of five) could simply vote
themselves rulers of 1/6th of our entire economy - the information and
technology sector.
Meaning the Internet that you currently enjoy - that has been a marvel of
economic and information innovation and success - will be subject to vast new
governmental regulations.  You didn't elect these people - but they are on the
verge of electing themselves Internet overlords.
The Internet is the future - and increasingly the present - of news and
information delivery.  With each passing day, we move a little further away
from the old media models - print, broadcast and cable television, radio - and
towards an all-Web world.  Eventually, most or all of the news and information
we get - written, and spoken into microphones and cameras - will be on and for
the Internet.
And we are on the verge of having this new world - the all-encompassing future
of First Amendment free speech in America - swallowed up by three unelected
D.C. bureaucrats and their Commission.
This is one of the most important battles ever waged in Washington - and
precious little is known about it outside the Beltway.
What we are talking about is Internet reclassification.  What that means is the
FCC - which by its own admission doesn't have authority over the Web - would
just vote itself said authority.  By reclassifying the Internet - so that it
would be subject to the same rules as landline telephones.
The FCC has long had tremendous power over landline telephones, which is why
there has been so much incredible innovation with them these last 70+ years.
(Note: tremendous sarcasm here.)
The FCC has no power over the Internet because the FCC doesn't have power over
anything until Congress writes a law saying they do.  And Congress has never
done this for the FCC with the Internet.
It's not just me saying this.  299 members of Congress have said so - a large
bipartisan majority.  More than 150 organizations, state legislators and
bloggers have said so.  So have seventeen minority groups - that are usually
almost always in Democrat lockstep.
So have many additional normally Democrat paragons, including several large
unions: AFL-CIO, Communications Workers of America (CWA),International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW); several racial grievance groups:
League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), Minority Media and Telecom
Council (MMTC), National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
(NAACP), Urban League; and an anti-free market environmentalist group: the
Sierra Club.
So too has the unanimous D.C. Circuit Court - led by a Democrat Bill
Clinton-appointee - ruling in April in the Comcast-BitTorrent case that the FCC
doesn't have the authority to regulate the Internet.
Most importantly, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has himself said so.  In an
interview last week with the Washington Post, the Chairman readily acknowledged
"(W)e have a Communications Act that wasn't written for broadband."
Chairman Genachowski is referring to the 1996 Telecommunications Act, the last
time Congress addressed communications policy and the authorities the FCC has
there over.  Broadband Internet for all intents and purposes didn't yet even
exist.
The remedy to all of this is crystal clear.  Congress should do what it's
supposed to do - write a law that defines and details the FCC's role (or lack
thereof) in regulating the Internet.
And the FCC should do what it's supposed to do - unless and until Congress
acts, NOTHING.
What the FCC must NOT do is unilaterally vote itself vast new powers under the
cover of bureaucratic, post-election darkness.
---------------------------------------------------
Note that in the US the FCC's charter was to control the *airwaves*, mainly
to insure compliance with the various international treaties and agreements
regarding the use of the radio spectrum.  About half a century ago they decided
they also had the power to control the telephone system and cable broadcast
systems.  Now they want it all.

--- FleetStreet 1.19+
 * Origin: Bob's Boneyard, Emerson, Iowa (1:300/3)