Text 12630, 94 rader
Skriven 2010-11-27 16:12:51 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
  Kommentar till text 12594 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: Marriage
================
25 Nov 10 10:46, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Roy Witt:

 RW>>>> I asked if Rosa was/is aware that you're not sure of your
 RW>>>> marital status.

 MvdV>>> Wrong assumption again. Nowhere did I state that I am unsure of
 MvdV>>> my marital status.

 RW>> Not an assumption, but a deduction. By reading the words you used,
 RW>> you didn't have to say it.

 MvdV> You assumed that I was unaware of my marital status.

Nope. You used the 'wife' word and stumbled along trying to undo what you
said, just like you're doing now.

 MvdV> A wrong assumptio,

I didn't make an assumption, it was deduction.

 MvdV> I was aware of my marial status all the time.

Of course you were, but you tried to get out of admitting that you were
married by clouding the discussion with more bullshit to cover it up.

 MvdV> Your powers of deduction are failng.

Not nearly as badly as yours.

 MvdV>>> She knows what is in the bible. Does not imply that she
 MvdV>>> believes it. Anyway what has the bible got to do with it?

 RW>> Nothing as far as I'm concerned, but someone else did ask about it.

 MvdV> Then why not query that somen else instead of me?

Just making my case.

 MvdV>>> Only in your perception.

 RW>> In any perception. see below;

 RW>>>> When two people are married, they're referred to as a couple or
 RW>>>> husband and wife.

 MvdV> By some.

By everyone who knows the difference. I'll forgive your error if you'll
just admit it.

 MvdV> And in this part of the world, sometimes they refer to each other
 MvdV> as "girl|boy friend".

I can't say that you're right or wrong in that, but you're wrong in saying
so. ("not over here" is a standard excuse you've used for so long, it
doesn't carry any weight anymore)

 MvdV>>> which does not stop them from being friends.

 RW>> I would hope not.

 MvdV> So that what is the problem with calling Rosa my girl?

Because she is no longer your girl, she's your wife.

 MvdV>>>>> Rosa is not my slave, I do not command her.

 RW>>>> Of course you don't, that shoe would be on the other foot if she
 RW>>>> were your wife.

 MvdV>        ^^^^
 MvdV> Now you assume again that she is not my wife...

English 101 goes over your head, again.

 MvdV>>> Wrong again.

 RW>> LOL! I don't think so.

 MvdV> You had better refrain from thinking at all.

And be like you? No thanks, I like thinking.

 MvdV> Better stick to mud throwing. That is the thing you are good at.

You shouldn't worry about that, it doesn't cling to you very well while
you're squirming to deny it. Of course, when you roll in it, you do look
kinda muddy.

                R\%/itt

 "Peltier was responsible for the close range execution of FBI agents..."
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000-10
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:387/22)