Text 1398, 37 rader
Skriven 2009-11-21 06:56:08 av Robert Bashe (2:2448/44)
   Kommentar till text 1372 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: Point Policy complaints
===============================
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Robert Bashe on Friday November 20 2009 at
10:14:

RB>> I suspect you may have written the complaint, but your bossnode
RB>> officially filed it, sonce otherwise it should have been thrown out
RB>> unjudged.

MV> No, I filed it and it was not thrown out.

Strange, then - if they followed Policy they should have thrown it out without
consideration of the merits. That was, in fact, done many times here in R24.

On the other hand, it was also considered excessively annoying for a node to
publish (or even read) an in-transit message, so maybe someone decided to
regard your complaint as information on this and act ex officio on the offence.

RB>> Maybe, but the procedure counts - or at least counted too. Otherwise
RB>> there wouldn't have been such a flap when a certain R24 point wanted
RB>> to becomne a node for the express purpose of filing PCs. Ask Ward
RB>> about that if you don't know the story, although I think you know who
RB>> the point and later node I refer to was/is.

MV> We had a similar one. A point that became a node so that he could be
MV> more effective in throwing sand in the cogs.

That was the effect, buit the point was that a node can file PCs, a point can't
- at least if the *Cs follow Poilcy, which they did in R24.

MV> He was a PITA for years until he finally he lost interest and left.

That's what usually happens, but somnething like this can (or could, when fido
was more active) stir up a lot of trouble.

Cheers, Bob

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-0613
 * Origin: Jabberwocky System - 02363-56073 ISDN/V34 (2:2448/44)