Text 18555, 150 rader
Skriven 2011-05-10 10:07:20 av Ross Cassell (1:123/456)
  Kommentar till text 18511 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: I wanna!
================
Hello Michiel!

10 May 11 09:42, you wrote to me:

 RC>> The Dutch arent very smart people, are they?

 MV> Menno Blom was not one of the smartest, but he was a lot smarter than
 MV> some pig headed USAians that insist one can have real sex with a girl
 MV> that only exists in cyber space.

One questions the intelligence of anyone seeking to have sex with a child, much
less an adult, using a computer as the method of contact.

You Dutch arent very smart people, are you?

 RC>> A variation in the time he chose, could have matched him up with
 RC>> a real one.

 MV> We do not judge people by what they would or could have done "if". We
 MV> judge them by what actually happened. There was no girl.

Like I said, you cultivate victims.

 RC>>>> You carry on as if that pervert knew he was talking to a
 RC>>>> sheriffs deputy.

 MV>>> He WAS talking to a sheriff's deputy...

 RC>> The Dutch arent very smart people, are they?

 RC>> The operative word is 'knew'.

 MV> You can't have it both ways. If "knowing or not knowing" makes a
 MV> difference, than it should do that whether it is convenient or not. If
 MV> not knowing he talked to a 50 year old LEO, then it should also make a
 MV> difference that he did not know, intent to have sex witha 14 yo is
 MV> against the law.

His actions were based on him thinking he was talking to a 14 yo girl and he
acted accordingly.

Unless his proclivities were something else like preferring sex with 50 yo men,
if he had known that the person was 50 yo, much less a LEO, he would not have
acted accordingly..

You Dutch are an extremely sick people.

 RC>>>> If he had zero intentions of molesting a child he would not
 RC>>>> have placed himself in that Chicago motel.

 MV> He had no intention of molesting a child.

Then why did he go to the motel?

 MV>>> He would not be in that hotel had there been no invitation from
 MV>>> the "girl".

 RC>> and lets thank our lucky stars it wasnt a real girl,

 MV> There wasn't.

Of course, we made sure there wasnt so we could protect them from Dutch
Perverts.

 RC>> that filthy Dutch Pervert Blom would have molested her for sure.

 MV> We do not judge people by "would have, if".

We judged this Dutch Pervert spot on.

 RC>>>> He is very much /your/ pervert since you justify his actions.

 MV>>> I defend him, not to justify his actions, I defend him because
 MV>>> he is my fellow citizen and he was doing nothing here that would
 MV>>> have gotten him into problems with the law.

 RC>> and had he not gotten off the plane or gone to a particular motel
 RC>> in Chicago, he would not have problems with any law..

 MV> And he would not have been in that hotel, probably never have been in
 MV> the USA, had that agent of the devil Chigaco cop not extended his
 MV> dirty claws across national borders into the territory of another
 MV> sovereign nation to cowardly lure the non suspecting victim into his
 MV> trap.

No, he would have been in the USA for that wedding, he purposely altered his
travel plans to molest what he thought was a 14 yo girl.

One must ask why the Dutch need to travel to do that?

 RC>> What is sad is that your society permits that sick shit, you
 RC>> nation is full of perverts.

 MV> The real sad thing is that you self appointed moral high grounders
 MV> fail to accept that other cultures lay the bars at different heights.
 MV> You lay the bar for consent at 16, we lay it at 14 under conditions. A
 MV> two year difference. Does that make the difference between perverts
 MV> and saints?

Your nation is full of evil perverts, the world would be safer if you all
stayed behind your dikes and levee's.

 MV> Or would you invoke the The Haugue Invasion Act?

We should return the Nederlands to the North Sea.

 RC>> If Felten invited you to Sweden, regardless of reason or
 RC>> enticement, the choice is still yours to make as to whether or
 RC>> not to accept it.

 MV> Björn would never invite me to Sweden with the objective of trying to
 MV> get me to break a law there, so that I could be thrown in a Swedish
 MV> jail. We do not do that here, laying traps is considered immoral here.

You have a comprehension deficit dont you?

 RC>> It is an example of you trying to impress your lack of morals
 RC>> onto everyone else.

 MV> On the contrary. The fact that you think it is ok to lay traps for
 MV> citizens of another country show that YOU have no morals.

Traps were laid for all comers, but we trapped a stupid Dutch Pervert!

 MV>>> No child was molested.

 RC>> One easily could have, that was what your pervert was intending
 RC>> on doing.

 MV> He had no intent to molest a child.

and you know this because?

 RC>> You people cultivate victims, we try to prevent it.

 MV> You have prevented nothing. On the contrary: your actions CREATED a
 MV> crime.

My actions?

==
Ross
Fidonet Feeds Or Fidonet In Your Newsreader: http://www.easternstar.info
E-mail: ross(at)cassell(dot)us | Other Places: http://links.cassell.us

Stand Or Fall!

... Without high taxes and welfare, Liberals are nothing!
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20060121
 * Origin: The Eastern Star - Spartanburg, SC USA (1:123/456)